Daily news sites

The following chart shows the natural log of annual change in the CPI less food and energy. When using logs, exponential growth (or in this case, decay) is seen as a straight line.


Click to enlarge.

No matter how hard the Fed tries, it cannot seem to break through the top of the decaying trend channel. So what's the latest tactic? Taper! Good luck on that. Maybe it works. Maybe it doesn't.

As seen in the following chart, the Fed has had substantially more "success" with energy though. The chart shows the annual change in the CPI for energy (not the natural log).


Click to enlarge.

And when I say "success", I really mean "confidence building" chaos. Note that ZIRP has actually helped to calm things down a bit in recent years. Nothing stops chaos like nothing apparently. So here oil is, chugging along at the $100 level looking for forward guidance. Perhaps it wants to believe that the global economy is robust, but it just isn't all that sure. Or perhaps that's just me talking as a permabear? (Hint: Oil can't actually believe anything. It's just a liquid. I may be a permabear, but I'm not entirely crazy, lol. Sigh.)

November 22, 2002
Deflation: Making Sure "It" Doesn't Happen Here


You will note that Bernanke did not mention wages or salaries in that paragraph, nor anywhere else in his speech for that matter. Perhaps the Fed's ability to decrease the value of a dollar is at best like a blunt hammer, and not a surgical instrument.

It would also seem that our government is not all that determined to generate higher spending at a level that could guarantee positive inflation (much like Japan since their housing bust in the early 1990s). Perhaps $100 oil, massive debt relative to disposable personal income, and a congressional approval rating of just 12% has something to do with it. Go figure.


That was then, this is now.

I know not with what weapons Great Recession III will be fought, but Great Recession IV will be fought with sticks and stones. Sigh.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #1
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #2

The Fed isn't quite sure what threshold it should be using to determine when to raise interest rates. Can't say I blame them. I therefore thought I'd offer some free (deflationary) advice.

Furniture sales and new home sales go hand in hand. Right? So simply raise rates when furniture store sales (as a percentage of disposable personal income) reach "normal" levels again. What could be easier? Transparent. Clean. Consistent.


Click to enlarge.

Let's zoom in on that recent trend in red and try to estimate how long it will take to get back to normal.


Click to enlarge.

The solution is clear. Raise rates just this side of never. Be just like Japan!

See Also:
Trend Line Disclaimer
Sarcasm Disclaimer

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the annual change in the 2-year moving average of retail sales (excluding food services). I'm going for a maximum smoothing approach to remove as much noise as possible (while still seeing the underlying trend).


Click to enlarge.

Good luck blaming the slow and steady growth rate decline (since 2012) on this winter's weather.

In May of 2012, I predicted that the next recession would hit on or before October 2014. Eight months to go. I see little reason to alter my opinion. At the rate we're going, it could be close enough for government work anyway. I truly hope I am wrong. Seriously.

If I am right (might not be of course), this is going to be a nasty recession. Why? Many seem to think a recession is impossible during ZIRP and that the Fed has saved us. What a confidence shaking wake-up call that would be.

I am especially amused by the party of 1999. Had we not thrown such a spectacular one (and hoarded for the Y2K bug that was a non-event), the recession may have happened right then and there. Praise be to celebratory can-kicking.

And lastly, rising interest rate environment my @$$.

This is not investment advice. As always, just ugly charts and opinions.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Retail Sales: Total (Excluding Food Services)

The following chart shows industrial capacity per capita (industrial production index adjusted for capacity utilization and population).


Click to enlarge.

That's a 0.998 correlation over 27 years of data (Jan 1967 to Jan 1994). And then... Boom! Trend broken big time. That has to be one of the most impressive trend failures I've ever posted on this blog. It was so incredibly consistent and predictable right up until it wasn't.

It's not where we've been but where we are headed that concerns me most. Now that we have all this extra capacity, what's the worst that could happen from here?


File:Abandoned Packard Automobile Factory Detroit 200.jpg (Albert duce)

It's not just us.

February 17, 2014
China Crackdown Drives Business Off the Books


February 10, 2014
Guest post: dealing with 500m tonnes of global steel overcapacity


January 27, 2014
China’s Aluminum Overcapacity Seen by Fitch Holding Down Prices


January 23, 2014
PetroChina delays operation of refineries on overcapacity

December 11, 2013
Overcapacity Threatens China Growth


I have never been more permabearish.

This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

The line in black shows real net corporate dividends.

The line in blue shows the real trade deficit (same scale).

The red line shows the exponential trend in real dividends from 1947:Q1 to 1987:Q1. Note the exponential trend failure (to the upside).

Will real dividends stay permanently elevated? Will profit margins stay permanently elevated? Can we be assured that the worst is behind us? Can we expect future growth in real dividends to match the growth we've seen since the early 1990s? I wouldn't answer a resounding yes to any of those questions. Call me skeptical, to put it mildly. Instead, I would ask the following question.


Put another way, it really helped the corporate bottom line to transition from "Made in USA" to "Made in ____." Mission accomplished. Now what? Persistently high oil prices (financial meltdowns notwithstanding)? Persistently stagnant wage growth? Persistently high unemployment? Increased rate of US (and/or global) financial meltdowns? In and out of ZIRP from here on out (if ever out)? Even more giant sucking sounds?

February 13, 2014
China auto market growth slows sharply in January



Other than corporate executives wishing to boost the value of their net worth and retire before the @#$% really hit(s) the fan, did anyone in power really think this through?

The Chinese drive more. We drive less out of necessity (as seen in annual vehicle miles traveled per capita that fell apart during the Great Recession and has yet to make any sort of recovery). That's our plan for a more prosperous America? Seriously?

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following scatter chart compares annual disposable personal income per capita growth (bottom scale) to the annual increase in the consumer price index (left scale).


Click to enlarge.

From 1960 to 2013:

1. 2009 was the worst year for disposable personal income growth per capita. It was also the record low year for consumer price inflation.

2. 2013 was the second worst year for disposable personal income growth per capita. Once again, inflation came in below expectations.

The following chart shows recent annual disposable personal income per capita growth. I'm using the monthly data instead of the annual averages this time to more adequately show all the gory details.


Click to enlarge.

January 10, 2014
Fed's Bullard: Inflation to pick up in 2014


1. Good luck on that inflation theory!
2. Brace for more surprises!

jjchandler.com: Tombstone Generator

Click to enlarge.

This is not investment advice, but damn.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #1
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #2

The following chart shows the annual change in beer, wine, and distilled alcoholic beverage wholesalers' sales.


Click to enlarge.

Don't let the trend line concern you. As seen in the next chart, I assure you that we are more than prepared to throw a legendary party!


Click to enlarge.

Just look at all that inventory accumulation. Yes, sir. Somebody must know something. The party's definitely coming!




Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #1
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #2

I bought a 19-year TIPS last June. It was actually a bit less than 19 years. It will mature on April 15, 2032. That means it is now an 18-year TIPS. I locked in a 1.06% real yield with intent to hold to maturity.

As of today:

The 20-year TIPS yields 1.07%.
The 10-year TIPS yields 0.53%.

Using interpolation, those purchasing the 18-year TIPS now are now only getting 0.96% (1.07% x 0.8 + 0.53% x 0.2 = 0.96%).

I therefore cannot complain about my most recent purchase (or any previous TIPS purchase for that matter).

Real yields have been falling rather consistently since the early 1980s. It has rarely paid to procrastinate when a real yield became acceptable. For what it is worth (as a permabear), I feel today's long-term real yield is acceptable. If I had more money to deploy (beyond emergency savings), I would buy more long-term TIPS at these levels.

1. There is a whopping $12.2 trillion still willing to earn a nominal yield of just 0.084%. Talk about a slow painful death (of inflation adjusted savings).

2. I think the direction of this economy over the long-term is directly tied to the direction of real yields over the long-term. Waiting around for better real yields is a bit like waiting around for a better economy (temporary bubbles notwithstanding). Good luck on that one.

3. I don't think the global economy can tolerate higher real yields (our economy in particular). I would point to what these "low rates" have done to recent stock market activity, recent emerging market activity, and holiday sales.

4. Where's the hyperinflation? If anything, the CPI is trending down again even though we've been in ZIRP for 5 full years. You may wonder why I like long-term inflation protected bonds when seen in that light. Well, I am a relative inflation agnostic over the long-term. My investments are a pure play on falling real growth instead, and real growth has been falling. Big shocker.

This is not investment advice. As always, just opinions. Maybe I am wrong to be a permabear. You know what? I sure hope I am! It would only help me if real yields rose because the economy was doing better. I'd be able to reinvest the proceeds at higher rates when my bonds mature. I really don't think I will be that lucky though (not by any stretch of my imagination). Sigh.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

The Fed wants 2% inflation per year. If real household median income and real household debt per capita can't get us there, then oil will have to do.

Here's the good news. If real household median income starts to fall again, then the Fed may help raise the price of oil to compensate again. In fact, the lower real median income goes, the more help they may offer! Genius!

Put another way, the less you make at work the more it may cost you to get to work! You know, just to balance it out and what not. This is such a great idea. Should give you all the motivation in the world to get paid more.

What label should we use to describe what's going on?

1. Deflation.
2. Inflation.
3. Stagflation.
4. All of the above.

You make the call. As for me, I'm calling it hyperdefstaginflation! We'll need two words to describe what we're feeling as well.

For the optimists: hyperdefstaginfelationed!
For the pessimists: hyperdefstaginfestationed!

As a side note, one can probably deduce the typical feeling based on how little it costs to fill one's gas tank as a percentage of net worth. The closer you are to the top 1%, the more you'll feel hyperdefstaginfelationed! Well, not always. There may be a little bit of whining involved.

January 28, 2014
VC legend Tom Perkins apologizes for comparing attack on rich to holocaust



File:If-us-land-mass-were-distributed-like-us-wealth.png (Stephen Ewen)

The 1% minority are being persecuted by that little red dot. Oh the humanity! Although none have lost their lives so far, there's been a great deal of emotional damage. When your net worth is over a billion dollars and you experience even 2% emotional damage, that's tens of millions of dollars! For a 200 pound billionaire, that's easily $6,250 per ounce in tainted self-worth! Don't the poor realize this?

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the natural log of the quarterly average of the 10-year treasury yield. When using natural logs, constant exponential growth (or decay) is seen as a straight line.


Click to enlarge.

I have added a parabolic trend channel in red that uses the data points shown in red. I have also added a parabolic trend in blue that uses all of the data points. Note that the correlation of the blue trend line is 0.89.

The long-term trend shows that the 10-year treasury yield has been decaying (not exactly rocket science here). It's not a pure exponential decay though. Since a parabola fits the data extremely well, I think the best way to describe it is as an exponential decay trend that has been accelerating to the downside. In other words, it has been exponentially decaying at a faster and faster rate. Hello Japan?

I know past performance is not necessarily indicative of the future, but where is the actual evidence that we are in a long-term rising interest rate environment? (And not just a short-term cyclical bounce within a declining trend channel?)

You may be wondering why I singled out the 5% interest rate target in the chart (with a natural log of 1.61). Well, wonder no more! It is inspired by the financial "experts" at MSN Money. Long time readers know that I'm not all that bullish on inflation adjusted gold prices at these levels, but I believe that the following article is a study in ridiculousness. I am therefore willing to place a "gold bug" hat on my head, if only for a day. You know, it's just an effort to balance things out a bit.

January 22, 2014
MSN Money: How gold could fall below $500 an ounce


If ifs and buts were candy and nuts then we'd all have a Merry Christmas. What hubris! The price of gold is pegged to 3 digits of "scientific" precision. All you need to know is a future long-term nominal interest rate? Forehead. Desk. Whack. Whack. Whack.


You think? Yeah, inflation might be a good backup plan if nominal interest rates aren't enough I suppose. For example, if inflation is running at 10% and the 10-year treasury yields 5% then I think we can pretty much forget about $500 gold. Call me silly if you must. (This is not a prediction that we will see 10% inflation and 5% interest rates of course. It's just an example.)


I wish you could have seen how quick I was to reject his simpleminded "behavioral" model. It may have even been a personal best! Unfortunately, I did not have a stopwatch at the time. And even if I had a stopwatch handy, I'm 49 years old and my reflexes aren't what they once were. I'm therefore not entirely sure I could have accurately timed such a short period to 3 digits of "scientific" precision.


Wow! 10 years of cherry picked data offered up a very high 0.78! Color me impressed. Of course, it is based on the premise that my 28 years of cherry picked data (as seen in the chart above) with a much higher 0.89 correlation has to fail spectacularly before his prediction even kicks in. In order to get to 5% interest rates, the natural log needs to rise to 1.61 on my chart. That is well outside the channel and well removed from the blue trend line. It would indeed be a spectacular fail. Could it happen? Of course it will, someday. That someday could be a very, very long time from now though. And in the meantime, who really knows what gold will be doing?

So, in the battle between cherry picked data sets, who are you going to believe? The very highly correlated 10 year model for gold's price that does not concern itself with inflation or the extremely highly correlated 28 year model of long-term interest rates that has a certain Japanese housing bust feel to it?

Put another way, if one assumes that we are in a rising interest rate environment when we very well might not be, then all kinds of crazy predictions are possible. Why stop at 5% interest rates? What will gold's price be if interest rates hit 50%? Better not tell me $47.10 or I will laugh my motherf#$%ing @$$ off! Seriously, lol.

This is not investment advice. I'm simply offering up an alternative theory for where interest rates are headed that matches my own beliefs. It is not proof of anything. If I had a crystal ball that could accurately predict the future, then I certainly wouldn't spend time making charts or offering up gold price predictions with a whopping 3 digits of "scientific" precision. Now would I? No, sir. I'm compelled to heckle instead. It might even be a disease. Please, for the love of all that's holy, someone help me stop! :)

See Also:
The Pulp Fiction of Rising Interest Rates

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the interest earned on MZM money stock divided by disposable personal income.


Click to enlarge.

Unless one counts cost cutting (and therefore weak employment growth) as a long-term growth strategy, we're apparently fresh out of "genius" ideas.

The chart is especially interesting if one considers how much MZM has grown relative to disposable personal income. It's almost like the more MZM we generate, the harder it is to generate interest off of it. Yeah, it's almost exactly like that. Think Japan.

This coincides well with my long standing belief that it will be increasingly difficult to make money off of money. Those anxiously awaiting higher/juicier real yields over the long-term may be in for serious disappointment, much to the ongoing dismay of Brett Arends at the Wall Street Journal. What a trip down memory lane that link is by the way. 2008, what a year!

This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the import price index for green coffee, cocoa beans, and sugar.


Click to enlarge.

Have I mentioned lately that we live in the era of "sure thing" exponential trend failures?



June 19, 2012
Def Leppard’s Joe Elliott Can’t Explain the Lyrics to “Pour Some Sugar on Me”


Hahaha! Damn, I love that band. Seriously. :)

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Import (End Use): Green Coffee, Cocoa Beans, Sugar

The following chart shows the number of child day care services employees.


Click to enlarge.

That's some recovery we've got there. It's strong and resilient. Yes, sir.

In my opinion, the Japanese should have patented massive economic busts and ongoing zero interest rate policies as effective birth control medicines. Just think of the royalties!

April 17, 2013
Japan's population suffers biggest fall in history


January 8, 2014
CDC: U.S. Fertility Rate Hits Record Low for 2nd Straight Year; 40.7% of Babies Born to Unmarried Women


Source Data:
BLS: Employment

The following chart shows personal current transfer receipts divided by government current receipts.


Click to enlarge.

On Basilisk Station (David Weber, Copyright © 1994)


No worries! That quote comes from a book of science fiction. All governments appearing in this work are fictitious. I'm sure that any resemblance to real governments is purely coincidental.

Check out the last three data points at the trough of the long-term channel.

2000:Q1: Good times!
2007:Q2: Better times!
2013:Q2: Best times!

Other than 2000 and 2007, perhaps there has never been a better time to swing for the fences? The stock market only goes up again! What could possibly go wrong? It is possible that the 2013:Q2 data point isn't the actual bottom. I can say this though. First, we bounced off of it. Second, if I exclude the 2013:Q2 data point (which I have tested) then the channel changes insignificantly. Put another way, that's where the channel seems to want to go anyway.

This is not investment advice. It's a chart, some possibly meaningless trend lines, and a potential warning. No crystal ball here. I'm just trying to point out a risk that you won't hear on CNBC. That said, it is a risk that I'm not willing to embrace. I've been "risk off" since 2004 and intend to stay that way permanently. In hindsight, I have no complaints so far.

On Basilisk Station is a favorite book of mine. It is free to download on the Kindle. The second book, Honor of the Queen, is also free to download. I received a Kindle for Christmas. I have no idea how I ever lived without it (especially now that my comfortable reading distance isn't what it once was). The Kindle is one reason I have been posting a bit less lately. (Another reason is that I'm also working very diligently on my New Year's resolution.)

I know what you must be thinking. Free is fine and dandy but how much is it going to cost to download a complete collection of H.P. Lovecraft (my favorite author)? 99 cents. Infinitely more expensive! Right? Just keep telling yourself that the cost per word isn't all that hyperinflationary. That's how I'm planning to do it once I get over the sticker shock anyway. Don't forget to factor in the savings from not driving to the mall to pick it up. That helps too (perhaps not so much for mall employees, but that's a story for a different post).

What an odd economy we have. I've often said that the best things in life are free or nearly free (once basic necessities are covered anyway). Free and/or 99 cents certainly qualifies.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

The line in blue shows the 5-year CD rate at commercial banks (left scale).

The line in black shows wages and salaries divided by deposits at commercial banks (right scale).

Here's the theory.

A lender's ability to lend is generally determined by the amount of their deposits (fractional reserve banking notwithstanding).

A lender's desire to lend is generally determined by the stable income streams of the borrowers (NINJA loans notwithstanding).

When wages (a bank's desire to lend) grow slower than deposits (a bank's ability to lend), then all things being equal (which they rarely are), the interest paid on deposits should fall (clearly seen in the chart). It's simply supply vs. demand. Not enough wages. Too many deposits.

Unlike nearly every financial expert on CNBC, I am not a believer that we're in a rising interest rate environment over the long-term. Wage growth is not keeping up with deposit growth. There are no signs of that trend changing any time soon (as seen in the declining black line in the chart). Why would I expect higher CD rates when there is a growing wage famine (nonfarm payroll employment) relative to a growing deposit glut (CPI adjusted deposits)? As seen in the following chart, note that this is a new development that began in February of 2000 (the peak in wages divided by deposits). In hindsight, Y2Katasrophe for the win!


Click to enlarge.

Inflation (or the lack of it) isn't really going to alter the dynamics much in my opinion. Banks aren't going to pay higher CD rates just because food costs more. I would be the last to argue that they're nonprofit food banks (Jamie Dimon sarcastically notwithstanding).

This is not investment advice. If it was, I would have written this post in Japanese as a tribute to Japan's popping housing bubble in the early 1990s and 20+ years of its ongoing low interest rate aftermath.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #1
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #2

The following chart shows the natural log of the 10-year treasury yield. When using natural logs, exponential growth is seen as a straight line.


Click to enlarge.

We've actually clawed our way back to the middle of the long-term declining trend channel. Hurray.

The 10-year yield is destined to climb up well outside of that miserable channel soon thanks to our financially innovative, modern, improved, strong, robust, and resilient economy. There are just four things we need to see first.

1. The End of ZIRP
2. Skyrocketing 5-Year CD Rates
3. Hot Snowballs
4. Avian Pigs

I could be wrong of course. Perhaps we'll get pork hot dogs at 50% off and flying snowballs instead. What a Christmas that would be!

December 23, 2013
Procrastinators may be rewarded


Don't forget to load up on Abercrombie & Fitch stock too! 50% off! It's all a part of their long-term plan to be financially innovative, modern, improved, strong, robust, and resilient! Pillar of retail strength!

December 23, 2013
Dark Side of After-Christmas Sales Starting BEFORE Christmas


You think? This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

December 9, 2013
Farmers Hoard Corn as Prices Drop


Adjusted for relatively modest overall consumer price inflation as reported by the government, exported corn is currently trading at early 1990s levels (as seen in the following chart).


Click to enlarge.

For what it is worth, I think corn prices could easily go either way from here. I have no opinion other than to say that the farmers hoarding corn are definitely betting big in the casino. Good luck on that.


You think? Ben Bernanke must be very pleased to see so much risk taking though. Corn prices only go up! Every corn kernel needs a place to live! They just aren't making any more corn! Okay, maybe that last one isn't quite true. I got caught up in the housing bubble mentality. Probably read too much David Lereah. Sorry about that!

December 11, 2010
John Williams of ShadowStats Warns Hyperinflation Will Start in the Next Couple Months!


It's been 36 months so far. Took the predictions very lightly. Still am. Yawn. If anything, perhaps I should brush up on my Japanese in case we're stuck in ZIRP (like they have been) for the rest of my life. Seriously.

This is not investment advice.

See Also:
Bananas for Silver!
Hyperinflation Theories Poned Again

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

Check out that pyramid scheme! We're all pharaohs now!

Estimated Completion Date: July 2020

Keep in mind that it is only an estimate. Since $1,500 is still triple the $500 in the 1990s, there's plenty of room for error should another recession hit between now and then.

Don't worry though. I'm just being silly. What could possibly go wrong now that the Fed has permanently put a stop to recessions? Just look at that 0.99 correlation since the peak! That linear trend will no doubt continue well past hitting the 1990s median! It's an unstoppable force and no immovable wall can slow it down! Yes, that's right. It's going negative, baby! This sure thing's got legs!

Don't you see what this means? We'll be borrowing negative amounts of money to fund our antimatter granite countertop purchases someday! It makes sense if you think about it. We apparently borrowed vast sums of positive money when real estate prices only went up. At some point in the future, we may be borrowing vast sums of negative money if real estate prices only go down again! Woohoo!

God does not build in straight lines. - Charlie Holloway, Prometheus (2012)

He does now! Charlie Holloway clearly never met Ben "There Is No Housing Bubble to Go Bust" Bernanke! He speaks! The world listens!

Why does the world listen? I have no idea. Such is the mystery of faith.

See Also:
Bernanke: There's No Housing Bubble to Go Bust

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the consumer price index for services divided by the consumer price index for nondurables.


Click to enlarge.

Goodbye service economy tailwinds.
Hello service economy headwinds.

Perhaps Bernanke can give our service economy some inflation but he sure can't seem to target where it goes. As seen in the chart, we eventually managed to get back to the trend line in the aftermath of the 1970s. We're sure making feeble progress these days though. Fantastic. Get out the party hats.

In fact, I am not confident that we will ever return to the trend line. This is yet another epic exponential growth failure. Using the power of future hindsight, we might even consider ourselves fortunate if we can maintain present levels. Sigh.

Why is this bad? When nondurables rise in price faster than services then this service economy's many, many service employees get the short end of the stick (even less stick than they currently think they are getting).

Durable good

Examples of nondurable goods include fast moving consumer goods such as cosmetics and cleaning products, food, fuel, beer, cigarettes, medication, office supplies, packaging and containers, paper and paper products, personal products, rubber, plastics, textiles, clothing and footwear.

While durable goods can usually be rented as well as bought, nondurable goods generally are not rented.

Nondurables are generally not rented yet? Say what? I sense a business opportunity!

May 4, 2012
Renting Prosperity


Rent the good life! Premium Gasoline! Beluga Caviar! Gurkha Black Dragons! Samuel Adams' Utopias! Lucentis! The Nondurable Rental Corporation of America will fulfill all your nondurable rental dreams and then some with low, low payments amortized over your remaining expected lifespan (with only modest surcharges of course)!

Have I mentioned lately that I'm a permabear? This is not investment advice. It's a business opportunity! Tap those severely tapped consumers before they are entirely tapped-out again! What could possibly go wrong? Genius!

In the epic battle between health care services, college education services, and nondurable fuel prices, which pain will ultimately reign supreme? Stay tuned! It's sure to be a hoot!

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

The good news is that we almost made it back to the top of the trend channel again. I'll leave the bad news as an exercise for the reader.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: CPI-U: Services Less Energy Services