Daily news sites

The following chart shows the annual change in the semiannual average of new one family homes sold in the West Census Region.


Click to enlarge.

What's the worst that could happen from here? Okay, sure. The growth rate is currently negative and has been falling for 18 months. That's just this winter's East Coast's polar vortex temporarily rippling back through space and time though. Any rational optimist can see that.

Further, we already knew that the East Coast's weather would carry over to existing home sales in the West. To think otherwise is just crazy talk!

In all seriousness, the housing optimists better hope we not only stay in the channel but move back above 0% soon, or speculators may someday wish that they had embraced their fistfuls of dollars instead.



Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The Fed isn't quite sure what threshold it should be using to determine when to raise interest rates. Can't say I blame them. I therefore thought I'd offer some free (deflationary) advice.

Furniture sales and new home sales go hand in hand. Right? So simply raise rates when furniture store sales (as a percentage of disposable personal income) reach "normal" levels again. What could be easier? Transparent. Clean. Consistent.


Click to enlarge.

Let's zoom in on that recent trend in red and try to estimate how long it will take to get back to normal.


Click to enlarge.

The solution is clear. Raise rates just this side of never. Be just like Japan!

See Also:
Trend Line Disclaimer
Sarcasm Disclaimer

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the annual change in the 2-year moving average of retail sales (excluding food services). I'm going for a maximum smoothing approach to remove as much noise as possible (while still seeing the underlying trend).


Click to enlarge.

Good luck blaming the slow and steady growth rate decline (since 2012) on this winter's weather.

In May of 2012, I predicted that the next recession would hit on or before October 2014. Eight months to go. I see little reason to alter my opinion. At the rate we're going, it could be close enough for government work anyway. I truly hope I am wrong. Seriously.

If I am right (might not be of course), this is going to be a nasty recession. Why? Many seem to think a recession is impossible during ZIRP and that the Fed has saved us. What a confidence shaking wake-up call that would be.

I am especially amused by the party of 1999. Had we not thrown such a spectacular one (and hoarded for the Y2K bug that was a non-event), the recession may have happened right then and there. Praise be to celebratory can-kicking.

And lastly, rising interest rate environment my @$$.

This is not investment advice. As always, just ugly charts and opinions.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Retail Sales: Total (Excluding Food Services)

The following chart shows real GDP.


Click to enlarge.

Four exponential trend lines and their growth rates have been added.

Note that each time an exponential trend fails, it is replaced with an exponential trend of lesser quality. What doesn't kill us, doesn't make us stronger. Go figure.

The next chart shows the long-term trend of those growth rates. I'm using the midpoint of my hand-picked expansions as the x-axis.


Click to enlarge.

The most recent data point is open to serious revision. The growth rate probably won't change much, but the x-axis position may (it could move to the right on the chart). It really comes down to how long this expansion lasts.

Real yields have fallen because real GDP growth has fallen (and continues to fall). It really is just that simple. Put another way, it is becoming harder and harder to make money off of money (current lofty stock market valuations notwithstanding).

Those hoping for a return to normal better hope that the downward trend does not continue, because that's about the only normal thing going on right now.

The future's so bright I gotta werewolves.



See Also:
The Long-Term Death of Real Yields

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Real GDP

The following chart shows the US trade deficit with China divided by the price of crude oil (annualized billions of barrels).


Click to enlarge.

It shows the amount of oil China could buy if they were to use their entire trade surplus with us to do so. That's assuming the price of oil would not be driven even higher in response to increased purchases of course, which is no doubt a bad assumption.

The next chart plots the natural log so that constant exponential growth can be seen as a straight line.


Click to enlarge.

China "sent" us ever increasing amounts of stuff that we want, yet we do not seem to be returning the favor by sending them ever increasing amounts of the stuff that they want (barrels of oil). Note that I used "sent" instead of "sends." The next chart explains why. It shows the annual growth rate of imports from China.


Click to enlarge.

As seen in the chart, the nominal growth rate is just about dead now. The growth rate in the middle of the channel is roughly 0%, which oddly enough is what the Fed feels short-term interest rates should be over an "extended period."

ZIRP-a-Dee-Doo-Dah


For what it is worth, I am not even remotely bullish on China (nor have I been since starting this blog in 2007). I also don't believe that I will ever feel the need to bribe a border guard to let me on the last plane to China. You know, as a desperate attempt to protect my future standard of living and freedoms (Patriot Act notwithstanding). Sigh.

This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #1
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #2
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #3

Click to enlarge.

The line in black shows real net corporate dividends.

The line in blue shows the real trade deficit (same scale).

The red line shows the exponential trend in real dividends from 1947:Q1 to 1987:Q1. Note the exponential trend failure (to the upside).

Will real dividends stay permanently elevated? Will profit margins stay permanently elevated? Can we be assured that the worst is behind us? Can we expect future growth in real dividends to match the growth we've seen since the early 1990s? I wouldn't answer a resounding yes to any of those questions. Call me skeptical, to put it mildly. Instead, I would ask the following question.


Put another way, it really helped the corporate bottom line to transition from "Made in USA" to "Made in ____." Mission accomplished. Now what? Persistently high oil prices (financial meltdowns notwithstanding)? Persistently stagnant wage growth? Persistently high unemployment? Increased rate of US (and/or global) financial meltdowns? In and out of ZIRP from here on out (if ever out)? Even more giant sucking sounds?

February 13, 2014
China auto market growth slows sharply in January



Other than corporate executives wishing to boost the value of their net worth and retire before the @#$% really hit(s) the fan, did anyone in power really think this through?

The Chinese drive more. We drive less out of necessity (as seen in annual vehicle miles traveled per capita that fell apart during the Great Recession and has yet to make any sort of recovery). That's our plan for a more prosperous America? Seriously?

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the annual change in the semiannual average of the producer price index for finished goods.


Click to enlarge.

1. Heckle the Fed for achieving long-term "stable price" certainty?

2. Heckle Jeremy Siegel for warning us that the Fed would raise rates well before 2014?

3. Heckle CNBC for warning us what the taper would do to interest rates?

4. Heckle Shadowstats for misguided hyperinflation theories?

So many many targets! So little time. I may be forced to resort to Sarcastic ZIRP Technology!



File:Minuteman III MIRV path.svg (Fastfission)

This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows nonfarm payrolls divided by initial claims. I'm using quarterly averages to smooth things out a bit (1967:Q1 to 2013:Q4). In my opinion, the higher the ratio, the higher the potential for layoff surprises.


Click to enlarge.

The 3rd order polynomial trend channel in red uses the red data points.

The 3rd order polynomial trend in blue uses all the data points.

I would be among the last to argue that a 3rd order polynomial can accurately predict the future. It can't, especially over the long-term. That said, damn. It's an ugly chart. We all better hope there is absolutely no truth buried within it. Unfortunately, as a permabear since 2004, I do believe there is some truth buried within it (or I would not have made the chart). How much truth remains to be seen.

In any event, I would once again point out that this is not 1982. We are not at the very bottom of the long-term channel with favorable long-term tailwinds. Instead, we are at the top of the channel with winds of a potentially different nature. Sigh.

Is it really any wonder that we're still trapped in ZIRP?



This is not investment advice.

See Also:
Trend Line Disclaimer

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF


Perfect!

It is just like cash, only it isn't cash. It's a professionally managed bond fund! Genius!

Check out the fund's chart. What's not to like? $2.4 billion in assets! Very popular!

July 20, 2009
Focus on short end of yield curve, PIMCO says

Focus as you patiently await the end of ZIRP! 5 years so far! But we really, really, really mean it this time!




This concludes today's sarcasm report. :)

The following chart compares the 3-month treasury bill yield in the aftermath of the Great Depression to the 3-month treasury bill yield in the aftermath of the Great Recession.


Click to enlarge.

For the record, I am not predicting World War III (nor would I expect it to even remotely solve our long-term ZIRP problem as effectively as World War II did).


I think you can see why I might be fond of ultra long-term inflation protected treasuries and I-Bonds. You might also understand why I might be somewhat skeptical of rising interest rate theories.

I believe we are trapped in ZIRP much like Japan has been since their housing bubble popped in the early 1990s (which will become all too apparent when the next recession hits, whenever that is).

We might temporarily escape from our padded cell at some point, but we'll never get the straight-jacket off, much less get past the search lights, the dogs, the barbed wire fences, and Janet Yellen, our trusted security guard. That's just asking too much, lol. Sigh.

Gallows humor.

February 11, 2014
Janet Yellen to Emerging Markets: Good Luck


Contrary to the opinion of those who think the stock market continues to go up easily from here and that vast riches await those willing to swing for the fences at any price, monetary policy is hard. For what it is worth, that's what I'm reading into what she has to say anyway.

This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: 3-Month Treasury Bill: Secondary Market Rate
NBER: US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions

The following scatter chart compares annual disposable personal income per capita growth (bottom scale) to the annual increase in the consumer price index (left scale).


Click to enlarge.

From 1960 to 2013:

1. 2009 was the worst year for disposable personal income growth per capita. It was also the record low year for consumer price inflation.

2. 2013 was the second worst year for disposable personal income growth per capita. Once again, inflation came in below expectations.

The following chart shows recent annual disposable personal income per capita growth. I'm using the monthly data instead of the annual averages this time to more adequately show all the gory details.


Click to enlarge.

January 10, 2014
Fed's Bullard: Inflation to pick up in 2014


1. Good luck on that inflation theory!
2. Brace for more surprises!

jjchandler.com: Tombstone Generator

Click to enlarge.

This is not investment advice, but damn.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #1
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #2

Click to enlarge.

The blue line shows the annual average of the St. Louis Fed Financial Stress Index and the Kansas City Financial Stress Index.

The red line shows the negative of the annual average of the real S&P 500 Index (December 2013 dollars).

1. The key to maintaining the stock market's currently lofty level is to keep the financial stress at a near record low. That's right. Keep it there permanently. Just say no to stress.

2. The key to maintaining the financial stress at a near record low is to keep the stock market at its currently lofty level. That's right. Keep it there permanently. Just say no to stress.

What could possibly go wrong with this circular reasoning strategy? As seen in the chart, there hasn't been this little financial stress in the system since the top of the housing bubble in the mid 2000s! Oh, what a carefree time that was!

I am very optimistic about our long-term future!! ZIRP! Employment growth! Real GDP growth! Real median household income growth! Uncharted territory growth! You name it! It's going to be an adventure.

February 11, 2014
ASX bets on derivatives clearing

This concludes the sarcasm report.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

The data in red (left scale) shows bank credit of all commercial banks divided by total savings deposits at all depository institutions. Think of it as a lending to savings ratio proxy.

The data in black (right scale) shows the 5-year CD rate (national rate of banks).

The data in blue (right scale) shows the 5-year treasury yield.

I would argue that the red data is a primary driver of interest rates (perhaps not the only one). All things being equal, as people deposit more money in banks relative to what banks are lending, interest rates go down. Put another way, banks have no incentive to offer great interest rates on savings when there is so much money being deposited.

Note that the 5-year treasury (in blue) has recently tried to diverge from this pattern. This is not its first attempt. Its last attempt (back in 2011) failed miserably. For what it is worth, I'm not a believer that it will succeed this time either. Rising interest rate environment? I don't think so. Could be wrong of course. Time will tell.

And lastly, note the extreme lack of a recovery in the lending to savings ratio (in red). It's just been down, down, down.

Here is a closer look at that lending to savings ratio over the past year (using weekly data instead of smoothed semiannual data).



Once again, it's just down, down, down. The lending drought and savings monsoon continues. Those patiently waiting for higher CD rates and higher 5-year treasury yields may be very disappointed. But what's new? They've generally been disappointed for 30+ years.

This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #1
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart #2

The following chart compares the trillions of dollars the monetary base has grown (in blue) to the trillions of dollars household net worth has grown (in red) since the first quarter of 2009.


Click to enlarge.

Each dollar the Fed spends gets us back ten! Why on earth is the Fed tapering the sure thing? We need even moar leverage! Not less!



Why hasn't anyone else thought of this? Genius!

December 17-18, 2013
Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee


Oops. Please disregard my crazy theory above. It would seem that I was offering the very thing the Fed is most worried about. You have to admit that it seemed like a darned good theory on paper though. I just hadn't factored in any unintended consequences. In my defense, it's really easy to do once I went down the "excessive risk-taking" path (gambling $10.8 trillion on a "sure thing" would definitely qualify).

Marrakesh Night Market



See Also:
Sarcasm Disclaimer

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

Big Bang


In layman's terms, rising interest rate environment my @$$.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the natural log of the combined total of religious construction spending, sewage and waste disposal construction spending, and amusement and recreation construction spending all divided by disposable personal income. I am once again using a natural log so that exponential growth (or in this case decay) can be seen as a straight line.


Click to enlarge.

Why religious, sewage and waste disposal, and amusement and recreation construction spending you might ask?

1. We have lost faith.
2. The @#$% is hitting the fan again.
3. We are not amused.



"Bond" is certainly having a good year so far (the last few weeks in particular). Shocking.

The 20-year TIPS is back under 1%. Let's just blame the next 20 years on a few months of cold weather and call it good.

This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

I bought a 19-year TIPS last June. It was actually a bit less than 19 years. It will mature on April 15, 2032. That means it is now an 18-year TIPS. I locked in a 1.06% real yield with intent to hold to maturity.

As of today:

The 20-year TIPS yields 1.07%.
The 10-year TIPS yields 0.53%.

Using interpolation, those purchasing the 18-year TIPS now are now only getting 0.96% (1.07% x 0.8 + 0.53% x 0.2 = 0.96%).

I therefore cannot complain about my most recent purchase (or any previous TIPS purchase for that matter).

Real yields have been falling rather consistently since the early 1980s. It has rarely paid to procrastinate when a real yield became acceptable. For what it is worth (as a permabear), I feel today's long-term real yield is acceptable. If I had more money to deploy (beyond emergency savings), I would buy more long-term TIPS at these levels.

1. There is a whopping $12.2 trillion still willing to earn a nominal yield of just 0.084%. Talk about a slow painful death (of inflation adjusted savings).

2. I think the direction of this economy over the long-term is directly tied to the direction of real yields over the long-term. Waiting around for better real yields is a bit like waiting around for a better economy (temporary bubbles notwithstanding). Good luck on that one.

3. I don't think the global economy can tolerate higher real yields (our economy in particular). I would point to what these "low rates" have done to recent stock market activity, recent emerging market activity, and holiday sales.

4. Where's the hyperinflation? If anything, the CPI is trending down again even though we've been in ZIRP for 5 full years. You may wonder why I like long-term inflation protected bonds when seen in that light. Well, I am a relative inflation agnostic over the long-term. My investments are a pure play on falling real growth instead, and real growth has been falling. Big shocker.

This is not investment advice. As always, just opinions. Maybe I am wrong to be a permabear. You know what? I sure hope I am! It would only help me if real yields rose because the economy was doing better. I'd be able to reinvest the proceeds at higher rates when my bonds mature. I really don't think I will be that lucky though (not by any stretch of my imagination). Sigh.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

Who could have guessed that declining real interest rates could eventually lead to less real income growth?

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

The following chart shows the semiannual average of the 30-year conventional mortgage rate.


Click to enlarge.

I have added an exponential decay trend line in blue and an exponential decay channel in red. To create the top of the channel, I multiplied the interest rate in blue by 1.2 (+20%). To create the bottom of the channel, I multiplied the interest rate in blue by 0.8 (-20%).

Over the long-term, does that look like a rising interest rate environment to you? Is there any indication, any indication at all, that the long-term trend is failing? As of the 2nd half of 2013, we're sitting right on the long-term trend line in blue.




This is not investment advice.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Click to enlarge.

Yahoo's data didn't start at the inception date, but it's close enough for government work.

Moral of the story? Wall Street always has your back!


File:Stab-in-the-back postcard.jpg

TBT Profile


To put it in perspective, 0.93% is roughly double what the average 5-year CD is paying. That's just adding insult to back injury.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: WTI Crude Oil Prices
Yahoo Finance: TBT Historical Prices