Daily news sites| Find Breaking World News
Latest Updates

NYC man convicted of stealing toner worth $376K

NYC man convicted of stealing toner worth $376K

NEW YORK (AP) — A former employee of a New York city law firm has been convicted of stealing more than $376,000 worth of copy machine toner from the firm.
Thirty-nine-year-old Adrian Rodriguez pleaded guilty to second-degree grand larceny for his thefts from the firm of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP.
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance said Tuesday that Rodriguez ordered more than $376,000 worth of toner from vendors between 2010 and 2012. Prosecutors said Rodriguez then resold the black ink toner for $10 per box and the color ink toner for $15 per box.
The cartridges were worth $80 to $259 apiece.
Officials have said Rodriguez's scheme was part of a growing black market for toner cartridges and other office supplies.
He will be sentenced May 21


Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/news/crime/article/NYC-man-convicted-of-stealing-toner-worth-376K-4438955.php#ixzz2Qel52L8T

Clear thinking on mass killings and gun control is slowly emerging

Clear thinking on mass killings and gun control is slowly emerging


Efforts to prevent future mass killings, like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting where 20 children and six adults died last year, continue on Capitol Hill. These efforts, however, are symbolic, not substantive, and focus too much on guns, magazines and related firearms issues, instead of on what causes people to commit these horrible crimes. The key element in these shootings is the mental condition of the killers and what things fostered their desire to kill people, and that must be addressed.

Whatever Congress comes up with will certainly put the liberties and privacy rights of Americans at risk, as limits on 2nd Amendment rights and invasions of private medical information will necessarily be under consideration.

We will not reduce mass shootings by limiting what law abiding gun owners can purchase, since they won't use them to hurt other people. Vice President Joe Biden's insulting implication that people don't really "need" an AR-15, and just want one because of how it feels ignores a basic tenet of the nation that elected him: we have personal liberties here, and that's all the reason we need to buy any gun.

Similarly, a blanket denial of 2nd Amendment rights to those with any record of treatment by or consultation with mental health professionals is excessive.

There has been strong support for the idea that guns, high-capacity magazines, etc. are responsible for mass shootings and should be restricted or banned, but that support is waning. More important is that this truly misses the point, and basing policies on missed points is a prescription for failure.

And now there is more compelling evidence that banning or restricting guns or magazines won't work, and even will make things worse, and it comes from a group that has instant credibility on this issue: police officers.

In March, PoliceOne, which serves police officers across the nation and has more than 450,000 registered members, "conducted the most comprehensive survey ever of American law enforcement officers’ opinions on the topic gripping the nation's attention in recent weeks: gun control," so states the introduction to PoliceOne's report.

"More than 15,000 verified law enforcement professionals [70 percent of whom are field-level law enforcers who are face-to-face in the fight against violent crime on a daily basis] took part in the survey, which aimed to bring together the thoughts and opinions of the only professional group devoted to limiting and defeating gun violence as part of their sworn responsibility," the introduction noted, in discussing the nearly-thirty question survey.

Here are some of the takeaway points from that survey:
** Ninety-five percent said that a federal ban on manufacture and sale of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds would not reduce violent crime.
** Seventy-one percent said that a federal ban on the manufacture and sale of some semi-automatics would have no effect on reducing violent crime. And, more than 20 percent say any ban would actually have a negative effect on reducing violent crime.
** Roughly 85 percent said passing the White House’s currently proposed legislation would have zero or a negative effect on their safety.
** They cited things they felt would help prevent mass shootings: more permissive concealed carry policies for civilians, 28 percent; more aggressive institutionalization for mentally ill persons, 19 percent;
more armed guards/paid security personnel, 15 percent.
** Nearly 90 percent believe casualties would be decreased if armed citizens were present at the onset of an active-shooter incident.
** More than 80 percent support arming school teachers and administrators who willingly volunteer to train with firearms and carry one on the job.
** More than half of respondents feel increased punishment for obviously illegal gun sales could reduce gun violence.
** The officers were about evenly split on whether citizens should be required to complete a safety training class before being allowed to buy a gun.
** They believe that cultural/societal influences promote gun violence: violent movies and video games, 14 percent; early release and short sentencing for violent offenders, 14 percent; poor identification/treatment of mentally-ill individuals, 10 percent. However, 38 percent cited a decline in parenting and family values.

The majority plainly does not support the ideas being pushed by gun-control advocates favoring restrictions on weapons and magazines, and many feel those controls will negatively affect their ability to fight violent crime. They also support enforcing existing laws before passing new ones.

The mainstream media openly supports restrictions on personal liberty, at least where guns are concerned, and suppresses news of gun owners stopping crimes. Many of our elected public servants, who prefer an unarmed and therefore compliant populace, also support gun control.

But the majority of police surveyed overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility.

Police officers patrolling America’s streets have a legitimate interest in making sure that we make decisions about guns that support their work and do not make things worse. With this survey, their voice has been heard, and they disagree with the current mania.

Perhaps it would be smart to listen to them.

Print theory




   I never get tired of wearing jeans and heels! This time I replaced the boyfriend jeans, my No.1 favorites, with wide leg denim and I paired them with more than one print.
A spin of Pop Art is always so refreshing no matter if you are wearing classic pieces or modern ones.
An artist always loves wearing art pieces !





                                                                                Top: thanks to Sheinside/ Here
                                                                                Necklace: DIY, made by Bogdan and I
                                                                                Jeans: Levis/ option Here 
                                                                                Heels: Shoemint/option Here 
                                                                                Clutch: 3.1Phillip Lim
                                                                                Sunglasses: Ralph Lauren





Don't Think. Feel. ... J. D. Longstreet

Don't Think. Feel.   ...   J. D. Longstreet
Don't Think. Feel.
The Politics Of Emotions
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

*********************

Oscar Wilde said:  “The emotions of man are stirred more quickly than man’s intelligence.”

That single sentence by Mr. Wilde, from a very long time ago, explains everything you need to know about the American left, indeed, leftists around the world.

They are ruled by emotions.  In my opinion,that explains their overly abundant use of profanity and vulgarity to express themselves.  

As I said above:  they are ruled by their emotions.  Rational, reasoned, thinking is nowhere to be found when these folks get their hormones flowing.

Those who populate the left side of the political spectrum are easily manipulated and they are manipulated quite often.  They are the "Useful Idiots" so often employed by the Marxists to further their agenda around the world and especially in the United States. 

It should be obvious why the word "idiot" is used in describing them.  Simply because they seem to be incapable of "reasoned" thinking.

For instance... have you paid attention to how the leaders of the left have manipulated their followers over gun control legislation?  They are using pure, raw, emotion.   It is of no concern to them that the laws they are proposing will not do a single thing to reduce gun violence n America. 

Gun control is all about people control, not gun control.  To realize their goal the left's leaders have whipped up the emotions of the useful idiot crowd and tossed any attempt at reasoned debate right out the window.  Their mission was to ignite as much emotion throughout America as was possible in the shortest time possible and get their gun control law through the Congress before Americans had a chance to cool off and look realistically at what was being proposed.

That explains the disrespectful way the victims of the school massacre in Connecticut were treated and the way their families have been treated -- and -- used as pawns to continue to stir up America's emotions.

Fortunately, the political right has caught on and began delaying tactics as soon as they possibly could to allow a cooling off period in which the ability to reason returned (to some degree) to the American populace.

Consider this from Kyle Becker at The American Thinker:  "Today's typical totalitarian leftist is thus not a jackboot-wearing thug, but an overly sensitive, cardigan-wearing milquetoast, whose obsessions about feelings make him immune to rational argument.  The danger of granting the government endless power to do good, like everything else, is rationalized away or dismissed by the leftist, since even the thought of making peace with an imperfect world makes him uncomfortable.  This is why the left will never learn from history: the past is only prologue to the coming utopia, which will be perfectly just and fair."   SOURCE:  http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/the_lefts_greatest_mind-trick_politicizing_emotion.html 

As crazy as it may sound at first, one must understand that liberalism is a philosophy of totalitarianism.  Liberalism is an authoritarian philosophy.   The left is all about accumulating unto themselves as much power as they possibly can.  See, they believe all that power will be used for good, which is to say used to further their agenda which, of course, IS good.  They will trample over their own grandmothers to acquire power.  In their minds the ends justify the means. 

They will not hesitate to use force to implement their "good" agenda.  Anything that helps bring their much sought after "Utopia" is justified.

As a conservative I believe absolutely in individual rights, liberty, and freedom.  But -- I have a very close friend who subscribes to the philosophy of the left and he is all for the "greater good" and pooh-poohs anything having to do with individual freedom and individual rights.

The very idea of America is based on the rights, the freedom, the liberty of the individual.  It is based on the fact that a man owns himself, that his life is his own to make of it what he will, what he is capable of, without outsiders, especially the government, forcing him to alter his life for the "greater good."

Mr. Becker, in his excellent article at The American Thinker says:  "The rule of law and the scientific method were developed precisely to protect human beings from the hazards of acting on raw emotion and ignorance.  Democratic politicians and left-wing activists, on the other hand, thrive on these human vulnerabilities." We encourage you to read Mr. Becker's article, in full, at:  http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/the_lefts_greatest_mind-trick_politicizing_emotion.html

As I write, America is facing the full brunt of Obamacare, socialized medicine. The majority of Americans never wanted it in the first place.  It was forced on us by a socialist Democratic Party. Not a single republican in Congress voted for it.

The left used raw emotion to to flay anyone who did not agree with them on socialized medicine for America.  Those of us who resisted were accused of not caring that sick people weren't being cared for  -- notwithstanding the fact that anyone, with or without funds, can, and will, be treated at a hospital in America just by showing up.  The left was attempting to whip up the emotion of the proletariat.

Even today, in the gun control debate, the left is using gut-wrenching, raw, undiluted emotion -- no reason mind you, just plain hyper-emotion -- to push their plan to confiscate America's guns.  The left doesn't care that some of us are embarrassed and sickened at their naked abuse of the victims and the families of the victims of recent violent episodes in which the gun was the tool chosen to deal death in large quantities.Again, for the left, the ends justify the means.
 
So, here we are today with emotion and reason squared off against each other in America -- the political left and the political right.  

Emotion and rational thinking are mutually exclusive.  There is no common ground.  This explains gridlock in our government. The left is furious with the right because the right will not succumb to their emotional tirades and just give in and allow them to drag America into the cesspool of socialism/communism.  (Make no mistake -- THAT is the end game for the political left.) 

Emotions have a way of cooling after awhile.  Smart politicians on the left understand the need to maintain the emotions of their followers at a fever pitch.  You, dear reader, need to understand this to know why America seems to lurch from one crisis to another -- continuously.  It is contrived by the leadership of the left to stoke the fires of emotion in their followers.  It is summed up in their motto:  "Never let a crisis go to waste."       

The left's use of emotion and arrogant condescension in politics is as old as Marxism, from which it sprang, and to which they subscribe.  The Utopia they seek is a Marxist America.

The "reasoning right" will never be free of the "emotional left."  Even if we split the country and gave the left, oh, say, all the territory west of the Mississippi.  They would be forever attacking us across the river because we OUGHT to be doing things THEIR way because they are GOOD and we are BAD, they are right and we are wrong, and their agenda is so good it must be forcibly instituted on us -- for our own good.

So what can we do, those of us who rely on reason in making decisions and ordering our lives both on a national and a personal level?  Other than recognizing the near insanity of the left, there is little we can do.  We must continue to block their advancement as often as we can, however, else the county would/will be in a state of utter chaos.  Too, we must understand that it is not going to get better.  The power brokers of the American left, and the world, have learned they can control the "useful idiots" of the left by whipping up  emotion and channeling that emotion in the direction they desire.  They will continue to take full advantage of that fact by taking America from one crisis to the next until, finally, she collapses.  Then the cycle will begin all over again.

I wish I could offer a more constructive, more satisfying answer to the problem, but I cannot.  Since Cain killed Abel in a fit of emotion we humans have been seeking a way to coexist amiably, peacefully, with our emotional brothers.   We have made some progress, but not nearly enough.  

Until such time as all emotion can be erased from the human mind, we are stuck, in place, dealing with our near insane brothers.  

On the other hand, we must never forget that emotions help make us human.

So. In the end, in the final analysis, we are involved in a never-ending struggle with ourselves.  The "reasoning right" can learn from the "emotional left" as they pile up failure after failure while feeling good about having tried!  We can learn from their mistakes, correct what we can, while ignoring their protestations,  order our world aright, and build a better tomorrow.  Really, we have no choice.

© J. D. Longstreet

indie mats giveaway

I'm about to make this a very happy Monday. Have I got a treat in store for you!


Y'all know I have a huge addiction to gallery walls. I've done several in my own house (here, here and here) and I'm always thinking of where I can put another one. In fact, I've had a blank bathroom wall giving me the stink eye for some time now (no pun intended) and it needed to be addressed.

So of course when I saw a display for Indie Mats at one of my favorite local stores I had to snap a set up for myself right away. OK, it wasn't that quick. It took me a good 20 minutes to decide which color and style to pick. It was fabulous wall overload.


Then I reached stalker fan status when I got home and learned more about the company. Emma and Anne are two friends with one great idea. They create high-style mats that are sustainable, recyclable and totally interchangeable. And extra bonus, no nails needed. My plaster walls thank you ladies. The cherry on top of it all, everything is made locally. Sisters are doin' it for themselves. (everyone sing with me)


To share the style, Emma and Anne have generously agreed to gift a set to one very lucky person. Here's what you need to do:

  • Make sure you are a follower of little black door {if you already are, I knew I liked you. If not, just click 'Join this Site' over on the right} Then, visit the Indie Mats store, pick out your favorite set and leave me a comment below with your pick. (make sure I have your email address too)



For additional entries you can also:
  • Blog, pin, tweet, Facebook or Instagram about the giveaway and link back to this post 


Be sure to leave a comment each time you've done any or all of these and then mark your calendars. The giveaway ends Monday, April 22nd at midnight. 

Best of luck!

Either Put up -- Or Shut-up! ... J. D. Longstreet

Either Put up -- Or Shut-up!    ...   J. D. Longstreet
Either Put up -- Or Shut-up!
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

******************

I hate braggarts and bullies!  Kim Jong Un has proven himself to be both.  I am tired of his mouth.  If he wants a fight, then, by all means, let's give him one -- and -- while we're at it, set those people he holds hostage free!

In case you've been vacationing off-planet recently, Kim Jong Un is the fat little sawed-off twenty-something with the Napoleon complex now ruling North Korea.  (At this writing, Kim has not been seen in public in at least two weeks.)  

Now that the crazy kid has a few nuclear fire crackers, he thinks he's king of the world.  There are indications of some serious mental issues (in abundance) in his less than rational behavior lately.

Now he wants to hit Tokyo with nukes first.   The Japanese have not taken his wild threats well and orders have gone out to their self defense forces to shoot down any missile that appears to be headed their way.

Little Kim has not taken the news well.  He is irate that the Japanese are not welcoming of a third mushroom cloud over another of their country's cities. 

Some words of warning -- and advice -- to Mr. Kim: 

I have news for you, little buddy.  If you light the fuse on your much touted bottle rocket, The big brother of the Japanese is going to rain down pure hell on you and your government and armed forces.  Why, it'll be enough to make a megalomaniac wet himself.

OK.   Maybe not.  Maybe we'll just send in some of our, uh, "specialists" to dispatch your sorry behind.

Kimmy, son, you act as if you are the first dictator to ever threaten the US.   Uh-uh. Nope.  In fact, somewhere on the Internet there is a video of a fellow by the name of Saddam swinging from a rope. You might want to view that video.  It could initiate, shall we call it,  an "attitude adjustment" on your part.  Who knows, you may have a life altering experience by just viewing the video.
 
One thing is for sure. Continue along the path you have chosen and you are certain to have a life-altering experience.  It's length may be altered making it substantially shorter than you expected.  Just saying.

Say Kimmy, did you miss class, in that swanky Swiss school, when they covered the part about America's policy of second strike and America's capability in a second strike.  See, the US policy has been, and remains, that any nation firing nukes at America will be fired upon from our substantial nuclear arsenal and those nuclear fireballs will continue blossoming over the offending nation until that piece of real estate simply no longer exists.  Yep.  That's the policy.

See all those US ships off your shoreline?  Well, it's the ones you don't see that will be dealing the death blow to the DPRK.  Suffice it to say, Kim, you're going to have a rotten day.

But, if you are determined, then come on, let's dance.

Look, Kimmy, baby, your infantile behavior is no longer funny.  Now it is just plan annoying. Even your long time supporter to the north has about had enough.  That's BAD news for you, Kimmy.   See, the US is a little stand-offish, about taking out national leaders. In fact, we have a rule/regulation against doing just that.  But, hey, your old buddy to the North has no such rule, law, or even qualms about removing an annoying national leader -- with extreme prejudice.

I'm an old man, son.  I have lived on the same earth and breathed the same air as the best dictators history has yet to offer -- Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Mao Zedong,  Idi Amin,  Ho Chi Minh, Saddam Hussein,  Muammar Qaddafi,  Juan Peron,  Ayatollah Khomeini, Ferdinand Marcos,  General Suharto,  Pol Pot, and Fransisco Franco -- and Kim, I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but son, you just don't measure up.

Now.  It's time to fish, or cut bait.  The world is no longer laughing at your antics.  Instead, they are looking for an excuse to light into you -- with gusto.  And you, young man, are very likely going to wind up at the end of a rope at the hands of your own people.

We're done.  We're finished playing now.  YOU get to decide how this thing ends.  But remember, you are playing with fire.  One false move, one slip-up, one mistake, or misstep, will bring the full wrath of the forces arrayed against you hurtling down upon your head.

Kim, it would appear your mouth has written a check your derriere cannot cash. You are now down to only two choices:  Put up, or shut up.  You choose.  We're ready either way.

© J. D. Longstreet

The Perfect Store(m)

The following chart shows inflation adjusted department store sales per capita.


Click to enlarge.

I've added a few ugly polynomial trend lines for your consideration. For a variety of reasons, here we go again.

Since the data was so ugly, I chose not to wait for March's official CPI but instead used Briefing.com's estimate of -0.1% found here. Close enough for government work!

This one's going to need a sound effect. Normally I'd jump at the opportunity to reuse a clown horn. MaxedOutMama once suggested a foghorn (see comments). I just don't think either of them will do the chart justice this time. It needs something that conveys even less prosperity and even more despair.



April 13, 2013
In the end, J.C. Penney’s board moved quickly with CEO move

A strong believer in Johnson’s vision, retail analyst Robin Lewis, said Thursday that his 17-month reign was “the most colossal, dramatic, tragic, transparent, rapid and microscopically tracked meltdown in the history of retailing.”

That about sums up Penney’s 111th year in business.

Here comes some bonus sarcasm. Brace for it.

The new CEO will no doubt do much better. All he has to do is navigate the near depression level economy while simultaneously fending off the rise of Amazon.com, Costco, and Sam's Club. How hard can that be?

Source Data:
U.S. Census: Retail Trade
St. Louis Fed: CPI
St. Louis Fed: Population

Metallic accents



Wearing my new metallic heels for the first time feels great!!! I must admit this is the perfect heel high for me when I have to walk a lot. Being practical and in the same time wearing high heels is a challenge
that I try to manage.
I hope you like it!
Have a wonderful rest of the day and a great new week!




                                                                              Top: Joe Fresh/ Here
                                                                              Pants: Levis/ option Here
                                                                              Heels: Zara/ Here
                                                                              Clutch: 3.1 Phillip Lim/ option Here
                                                                              Sunglasse: c/o zeroUV
                                                                              Silver bracelet: Jewelmint c/o Bollare/ Here
                                                                              Bangle bracelet: c/o COOEE.se/ Here





Jon Stewart Unveils The Republican Black Strategy of the last 60 years

Jon Stewart Mocks Rand Paul's Howard Speech: 'You Can't Yadda Yadda Yadda The Last 60 Years' (VIDEO)


Jon Stewart began Thursday's "Daily Show" with a look at Rand Paul's visit to Howard University. After announcing that people told him he was either "brave or crazy" to go speak at the traditionally black school, Paul attempted to convince the students that the Republican party has always been on the right side of civil rights history... if you disregard the last 60 years, of course.
Stewart was quick to point out that "you can't just yadda yadda yadda the last 60 Republican years," noting that it was the racist response to the civil rights movement that led many Democrats to leave their party and join the Republicans, changing the face of the GOP forever.
Watch part one with Stewart above and check out "Senior Black Correspondent" Larry Wilmore's in-depth analysis of Paul's speech below.




http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca...

Exponential Trend Failure of the Day


Click to enlarge.

First it Giveth

"First it giveth, then it taketh away."

Hell hath no fury like a momentum investor scorned. And one thing is fairly clear, those who bought gold at the recent peak in 2011 are seriously scorned at this point. At the very least, gold is generating fewer prophets. Pun intended.

On the one hand, I would not rule out a return to the red trend line. The odds seem very low, but anything can happen. You certainly won't see me short gold. Let's just say that I will make no attempt to profit off of its potential demise. "Not my style." (That last quote is an ongoing inside joke. See the comments found here. As of today, SHLD is down 44% since MAB and I were heckled in 2008 for heckling Sears. Sears is the gift that just keeps on giving.)

On the other hand, you won't see me bet on a return to that long-term trend either. I think gold is still extremely expensive relative to toilet paper and aluminum. I have no desire to own gold or silver again at anywhere near these prices. There's ample downside risk left in both of them in the coming years. I've charted many serious exponential trend failures on this blog over the years and very few of them, if any, have actually unfailed. Not all have crashed though, so keep that in mind. For example, the recurring employment exponential failure hasn't crashed so much as stagnated. Gold could do the same or even better. Who knows?

As a side note, the modern miracle metal known as aluminum is considerably cheaper than it was 5 years ago. That has to be adding at least some extra downside pressure to the price of gold. I once again ask, where are the aluminum speculators? Perhaps aluminum is shiny but not all that sexy? Aluminum also pokes a sizable hole in the seemingly never-ending impending hyperinflation theories that some sites love to offer (especially to paid subscribers).

I'm not trying to suggest that we can't hyperinflate. We can and eventually probably will. Eventually could be a very, very long time though. I'm not at all convinced that we will do it in my lifetime. I am factoring in my 48 years of age. Your results may vary (especially if considerably younger). If the economy gets bad enough, then I might have to take on more risk to lower my longevity. You know, like mountain climbing while wearing nothing but a swimsuit. But one way or another, I intend to have my nest egg last the rest of my life! Gallows humor! ;)

The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. - Alan Greenspan, 1966

I absolutely believe that. Pick your poison. I continue to sit in long-term TIPS (with intent to hold to maturity), long-term I-Bonds, long-term EE-Bonds, and short-term cash. I'm not expecting miracles. If I am financially ruined (possible), then I won't be ruined alone. There will be many, many others joining me. With rates this low, one might even say that I am slowly being financially ruined (and new investors definitely are). It is manageable though. Fortunately, I locked in rates when Jeremy Siegel warned me to stay away. I refer to him now as Wrong Way Siegel, partly in reference to Wrongway Feldman of Gilligan's Island fame. Why would anyone listen to his interest rate theories at this point? Year after year, just how much more wrong could he be?

If by some chance real yields do rise significantly, then I predict his precious stock market ("Stocks for the Long Run") will get seriously kicked in the you know what again. He won't see that coming either. As seen in the this chart, real yields last rose significantly during the deflationary great recession. Even buried cash had a positive real yield as prices fell. That's why TIPS yields rose. It wasn't because the magical economy fairy cast a wondrous spell and prosperity had been fully restored. The 1980s and 1990s are over. Those rules no longer apply.

This is not investment advice. It is filled with opinions though. Opinions and 50 cents would get you a cup of coffee. Not now of course. There has been some inflation over the years. In recent days, not so much.

So what's behind the drastic price cut?

"The firm could be betting on widening income inequality," Stock said.

What does Starbucks know that we don't do? Sigh.

Source Data:
Yahoo Finance: Historical GLD Prices