Daily news sites| Find Breaking World News
Latest Updates

Immigration and a Need for Rational Compromise...

Immigration and a Need for Rational Compromise...
by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny


America must indeed do something to overcome the HUGE immigration problem created over the past thirty three plus years. A problem that everyone (in both parties) one knew was developing and yet no one in either party had any real interest in addressing. So... here we are. Faced with HUGE problem that won;'t go away by itself and will requires some level of rational thinking on the part of both the democrats as well as republicans.

Speaker John Boehner may not get it right often, however, when he stated... “we’d be in a much weaker position if we didn’t act" with respect to immigration reform he was EXACTLY right.

THE HILL - Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) urged their House Republican colleagues to pass immigration reform legislation in a closed-door meeting Wednesday, with the Speaker arguing his conference would be “in a much weaker position” if it failed to act.

A divided House Republican conference met for more than two hours in the basement of the Capitol to begin hashing out a response to the sweeping immigration bill the Senate passed last month.

Boehner spoke at the outset of the meeting and reiterated his pledge that no immigration bill, including a final House-Senate conference report, would come to the floor without the support of a majority of the House GOP. But both he and Ryan, the House budget chief and the GOP’s vice presidential nominee in 2012, made the case that the House GOP should take action on immigration in a way that reflected the party’s principles, Republicans in the room said.

Boehner “said we’d be in a much weaker position if we didn’t act,” according to Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.). “He clearly wants to act, thinks something needs to get done. Frankly, our principles are probably closer to where the American people are, but it’s incumbent upon us to act.”

The party leadership did not lay out a timetable for floor votes in the meeting, though members indicated leaders could develop a timeline in the coming weeks.

Members said it was likely that the House would wait until after the August congressional recess to act, although votes on individual border security and interior enforcement bills that have passed out of committee were possible before then.

Following the meeting, Ryan said he was optimistic the House would act.

“I think our members are ready to tackle this issue. It needs to be fixed,” he told reporters. “There is an emerging consensus that our immigration system is broken, that we need to fix it, and we need to do it in a very thorough way.

“I feel very good. I feel we are in very good position to do it the right way. We don't want to rush anything,” he said before diving into a crowded elevator.

But opponents of any legislation providing a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants said there was no consensus on immigration's most controversial issue.

“There is little consensus in there for doing anything other than border security," said Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.). {Read More}

At this point I refer you to the preceding post...

Via: Memeorandum

The Seach for Sanity in America's Overheated Political Hyperbole and Denial of Reason...

by:Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny




For those on the left side of the aisle, and  those on the right side of the aisle who are REALLY about getting something of substance accomplished the following will be REQUIRED..


Any questions?

Via: Reason

Willie Colón Became The First Salsero To Perform At Milwaukee's Fiesta Mexicana 1984

Willie Colón and H. Nelson Goodson

In Wisconsin history, Willie Colón, a professional Salsero singer from New York became the first to perform at Fiesta Mexicana in 1984.

July 10, 2013

Milw., WI  (HNNUSA) - On August 1984, Willie Colón from New York became the first professional Salsero to perform for the first time at Fiesta Mexicana. Colón and H. Nelson Goodson posed for a photo before the historical performance.
Goodson was instrumental by lobbying and convincing Fiesta Mexicana officials to add for the first time a Salsa performer to attract the Puerto Rican community and their buying economic power. Several Fiesta Mexicana Board members had objected by saying it was a Fiesta Mexicana, but Goodson was able to convince the rest of the Board that Fiesta Mexicana was growing and needed more revenue to provide more scholarships for students. The Salsa performer addition would significantly attract the crowds that were usually left out in the past from attending the lakefront event. 
That year, Colón's performance drew thousands to the Miller Stage and broke Fiesta's attendence records for that Saturday night. Since then, Salsa and other Puerto Rican venues have continued to attract crowds at Fiesta, despite the change of operators of the event at Summerfest.

The CAT'S eye








                                         All the eyes( cat eyes) on colors or rather candy colors!
What can be more fun than playing with vivid colors and a cat print on a Summer day? I will use any excuse for mixing and matching all the colors from my paintings in my outfits and this one today is a great example.
                                                             I hope you like it and have a colorful rest of the week!




                                                                      Sweater: Paul & Joe Sister/ option Here 
                                                                      Bermuda shorts: Michael Kors/ Here and Here 
                                                                      Pointed heels: Shoemint/ great options (blueHere and (light blueHere 
                                                                      Clutch: Diesel
                                                                      Sunglasses: c/o zeroUV/ option Here 
                                                                      Cuff bracelet: Vince Camuto/ option Here 


                                                                                  

Salsero To The End Of The Road

Joe Pasqualine

Photos: HNG/HNNUSA

In memory of a good Salsero friend.

July 10, 2013

Milw., WI (HNNUSA) - On December 15, 2002, three Salseros Joe "Joey" Pasqualine, H. Nelson Goodson and Sebastian Morales from Babalu (Gaucho Grill) decided to go have breakfast at a local restaurant on S. 27th and Morgan after clubbing. Pasqualine, 34, originally from Arecibo, P.R. invited Goodson and Morales to ride with him, but both Goodson and Morales decided to take their own vehicles to the restaurant, so Pasqualine didn't have to drive back to the club at the 600 block of W. National Ave. He had just moved about half a mile from the restaurant.
Pasqualine got into I-94 Southbound and both Goodson and Morales followed behind. They all took the Holt exit and Pasqualine managed to make it through the yellow traffic light on S. 6th and headed West on Holt, which later turns into Morgan Ave. While Goodson and Morales waited at the stop light.
After a few minutes, both Goodson and Morales preceded West on Holt after the light turned green. Then Goodson at the 1700 block of W. Morgan Ave., which Holt turns into, around 2:30 a.m. he noticed an accident and an upside down vehicle wrapped around a tree. It took Goodson several minutes to realize that it was Pasqualine's vehicle.
Police later indicated, Pasqualine must have been racing Westbound with white color vehicle and lost control, then hit the curb making the car fly, flip upside down and wrapping around a tree upon impact.
Pasqualine was not drinking that night, according to Goodson. Goodson remembers when Pasqualine arrived at the club. Goodson noticed a dark shadow following Pasqualine, but Goodson couldn't determine what it was, since he was wearing all black. Goodson remembers asking Pasqualine, if something was wrong and he answered nothing was unusual.
If Goodson and Morales would have rode with Pasqualine, Goodson would have sat in the back seat and Morales in the front passenger's side. Both the front passenger's side and  rear of the vehicle were squashed like a soda can. Goodson along with Morales could have not survived and possibly would have had been buried with the vehicle.

Rush Limbaugh: out of touch with the mainstream

Rush Limbaugh: out of touch with the mainstream

Rush Limbaugh: out of touch with the mainstream

 

America’s conservative archetype, Rush Limbaugh, has lost touch with the mainstream. Comments he made in 2010 have come back to haunt him. A recent caller to CSPAN reminded America of Rush’s insensitive remarks concerning school lunch programs and their lack of availability during the summer months. Rush stated parents should be feeding their children from home refrigerators or take them to a cheap fast food establishment when schools are closed. In the event those maneuvers did not work children can “dumpster dive” similar to homeless persons. As a conservative, I found his approach to this subject heartless. Yet, there is a more profound problem Rush views everything through a filter, which denies his sight a reality the rest of us see. Many children live within a dysfunctional family structure. Children from these homes may not have food readily available in the refrigerator or someone to give them a dollar for a McDonald’s meal, as Rush Suggested. School lunch programs provide the nutrients millions of children would not receive otherwise. Apparently, his views have not changed over the last three years. Rush’s comments on health care are equally incredulous. Through his golden EIB microphone Rush has stated repeatedly that Obamacare is wrong for the nation, yet his belief that everyone has equal access to medical services is a farce. Wealthy individuals obtain health care with the speed of thought, the rest of us wait in line. Rush is having a tenuous relationship with conservatism. He lives in his self-created Elysium, which prevents him from seeing the suffering many of us must bear under from a regime that is literally destroying the nation. There is no doubt that Rush has been a bellwether of conservative views for nearly 25, but father time may have paid him a visit. Perhaps this is the time Rush should bow out gracefully and hand over his microphone to one of his younger contemporaries. The World does not revolve around parties anymore, only around people. In the event Rush has a reawakening, he must realize this fact and help the masses with substance, which his daily allotment of verbiage leaves out. As an avid listener of his program, I hope he makes the right decision. Mark Davis MD. President of Healthnets Review Services and Davis Book Reviews, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com, americassage@gmail.com Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster.

as the mantel turns

Like sands through the hourglass, so is the mantel in my living room. The sucker is a revolving door of indecision. As my dear friend Linda says, I'm mantelly challenged. In fact, I've even got a board on Pinterest just for mantels - it is an obsession.

The bug hit again not too long ago and I changed it up after seeing what Bryn did with a client's mantel. I've got a collection of milk glass, why not put it to use.


This is probably the happiest I've been with the mantel in a while. Says the girl that will probably change the whole thing around next month.

I cannot begin to even count how many times I've changed this mantel around. This is the fourth mirror in 6 1/2 years, if that tells you anything. Psycho much?

I even found a few pictures of the evolution.










Thanks CNN Living for sharing my most recent mantel this week. Check it out here.

Is there a spot in your house that you change even more frequently than others? Do you have a mantel that you feel is never quite right? Want to place bets on how long before I change it all around again?

Only in the Minds of the Non Thinking... Democrats

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny



Apparently some democrats and progressives consider putting a National Park on the Moon, at what cost only Zeus knows, is money money well spent.

THE HILL - Two House Democrats have proposed legislation that would establish a national historical park on the surface of the moon to mark where the Apollo missions landed between 1969 and 1972.

The bill from Reps. Donna Edwards (D-Md.) and Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas) would create the Apollo Lunar Landing Sites National Historical Park. The park would be comprised of all artifacts left on the surface of the moon from the Apollo 11 through 17 missions.

The bill says these sites need to be protected because of the anticipated increase in commercial moon landings in the future.

"As commercial enterprises and foreign nations acquire the ability to land on the Moon, it is necessary to protect the Apollo lunar landing sites for posterity," according to the text of the Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act, H.R. 2617.

Under the legislation, the park would be established no later than one year after the bill passes and would be run jointly by the Department of the Interior and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). {Read More}

Via: Memeorandum

GOP immigration plan devised by Communist Party

GOP immigration plan devised by Communist Party


The U.S. Senate’s “Gang of Eight” immigration-reform plan, as well as a strikingly similar plan now being backed by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and a bi-partisan House “Gang,” both offer the “roadmap to citizenship” originally conceived and carefully developed by members of the Communist Party USA working within the Democratic Party and the radical left activist network. It is no surprise that their only real purpose is to use amnestied illegals to build a “permanent progressive majority.”

That is the inescapable conclusion readers will draw after reading the forthcoming book by acclaimed researcher and blogger Trevor Loudon, titled “TheEnemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress.”Although not yet published, Loudon agreed to allow WND readers to preview one chapter, titled “LatinoImmigrants: Tools to Ensure a ‘Governing Coalition’ for the Left.”

In the book, Loudon exhaustively documents the Left’s longtime agenda regarding illegal aliens and how its activists have gone about implementing it. He provides irrefutable proof that the entire immigration-reform movement was the brainchild of American communists and that their goal has long been to establish unchallengeable political supremacy.

According to Loudon, the Communist Party USA has influenced U.S. policy toward illegals since at least the 1960s. He traces the history, showing how communists and communist-founded organizations slowly built the movement from the ground up. While other groups certainly joined the effort, the communists were always at the center.

For example, he tells the story of CPUSA member Bert Corona, the “Communist Father of the ‘Immigrants Rights’ movement.” In 1964, Corona, Cesar Chavez and future Democratic Socialists of America member Dolores Huerta forced Congress to end the guest worker “Bracero” program. Later, Corona sought ways to address “problems confronting Mexicans in the United States who had no visas or citizenship documents” – in other words, illegal aliens – including “how to defend persons detained by immigration authorities and how to help immigrants acquire disability and unemployment insurance and welfare.”

Along the way, Corona founded and/or led numerous organizations, such as the Mexican American Political Association, or MAPA, Centro de Action Social Autonoma, or CASA, and La Hermandad Mexicana Nacional (the National Mexican Brotherhood), all influential in the “immigrant rights” movement. The Communist Party still has strong influence in MAPA, which acts as a king-maker for Democratic Party candidates in the Los Angeles area.

Antonio Villaraigosa, former Los Angeles mayor and 2012 chairman of the Democratic National Convention, got his start with CASA. He was also a former member of the Communist Venceremos Brigades and worked with the Brigades in Cuba. As mayor of Los Angeles, he was “the most pro-illegal immigrant mayor the city has ever seen.”

Lorenzo Torrez, a long-time organizer of the Arizona Communist Party, paved the way for Communist-backed Congressmen Ed Pastor and Raul Grijalva to win congressional seats in Arizona. He organized opposition to Southwestern states attempting to prevent illegal immigration and also helped change voting patterns across the entire region.

Loudon’s book identifies many influential communist and socialist politicians holding positions of influence in Congress and state and local governing bodies. For example, Rep. Judy Chu,D.-Calif., writes Loudon, has “a thirty-year history with the now defunct pro-China Communist Workers Party (CWP) and its surviving networks.” Chu is an advocate for “progressive” immigration reform and was a co-sponsor of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform bill introduced by Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) in 2010. In 2012, Chu served as co-chair of President Obama’s reelection campaign.

For his part, Gutierrez is a former member of theMarxist-Leninist Puerto Rican Socialist Party, and chairs the Immigration Task Force of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. Longtime amnesty activists Gutierrez and Rep. Xavier Becerra(D-CA), both members of the CongressionalProgressive Caucus, are working with House Republicans on this latest amnesty effort.

As for the Communists, today’s Communist Party USA cites the current amnesty effort as its top legislative priority. Its official position is virtually indistinguishable from that of the Democratic Party…

More…

Obama Supporters Sign Petition to Repeal the Bill Of Rights

Stolen from (with permission) Wake Up America

This one will get your dander up.


Click here if video fails to load.

Mark Dice asks California beach goers if they'll sign a petition showing support for Obama in his quest to repeal the Bill of Rights.

Make Congress less remote by implementing remote working methods

Make Congress less remote by implementing remote working methods


That Americans disapprove of the job Congress is doing is beyond debate. A set of polls from five different polling organizations running from June 1 through July 1 show an approval rate ranging from 9 percent to 17 percent, an indictment of current members and what they are doing if ever there was one.

There is little agreement between Democrats and Republicans in both houses on any subject, and Congress stooped to using the most devious process in recent years to ram through the highly partisan Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, which was opposed by a majority of the American people when it was being considered, and is even more strongly opposed today. Congress acted in opposition to the will of the people, a serious breach of trust.

It has long been the practice for Members of Congress to essentially become residents of the DC area when they are elected and spend scant time in their home states and districts, and despite their best intentions cannot avoid becoming Washington insiders to some degree, and thus residents of their home states in name only.

Furthermore, many members of Congress fancy themselves as "special," part of an elite group, and all of them benefit from job-related perks the rest of us don't have access to, like gold-plated health and retirement programs that ought to be illegal, a big salary and staff, being treated like queens and kings, and who often make decisions that are aimed at satisfying special interests rather than making the best decisions for their constituents and for the nation.

What we see today is a fulfilling of Thomas Jefferson's prophecy: "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yeild (Jefferson's spelling), and government to gain ground," which he wrote in a letter to Edward Carrington in 1788.

Power corrupts, they say, and the lure of power partially accounts for the increasing domination of the federal government over the citizens. Another reason is that it is much easier for special interests to access our Senators and Representatives than for the voters that elected them. That statement is not necessarily a slam at elected officials or their staffs, who may work diligently to serve the citizenry, but a criticism of the geographic distance from the official's home state or district and the small amount of time available to spend back home.

A popular concept about responsive government is that the most responsive leaders are those that can most easily be reached; it's easier to communicate your ideas to members of the city council and county supervisors than to your Congressional representatives. A trip across the street, downtown or to the next town is far more satisfactory than a trip to Washington.

In the beginning, those serving in Congress spent a few weeks in Washington each year and the rest of the time at home working at their jobs as farmers, business owners, doctors and lawyers. Perhaps despite its strong appeal it isn't realistic to return completely to that arrangement, but two Congressmen have suggested a change to the way the House of Representatives works that is a step in that direction.

California Democrat Representative Eric Swalwell recently introduced a proposal to amend House rules to enable lawmakers to take care of business from their district offices, instead of having to be in Washington so much of the time. His idea involves using the latest technologies like video conferencing for hearings, committee meetings and the like, and a secure remote voting system. As of last weekend, two others had signed on as cosponsors, Republicans Cynthia Lummis from Wyoming and New Mexico’s Steve Pearce, who had previously introduced a similar measure that would require representatives to appear in person for certain required or essential House activities.

This idea has great appeal. Wouldn't it be terrific for our elected representatives to be able to attend local events regularly? Wouldn't it be great to find yourself in line at the grocery store in front of your senator or representative, or to run into him or her at a sporting event or a restaurant, and when you visited one of the district offices to find them working there?

Undoubtedly, our officials would have a much better sense of what their constituents think about the pressing issues of the day when they interact with them on a daily basis than when they rarely see them face to face. And it would make more difficult the special interest lobbying that now poisons the legislative process.

Currently, Congress meets only three or four days a week for most of the year, due to holidays and allowances for members to travel to and from home to spend a little time with their families and constituents. Such an arrangement might also result in lower spending for Congressional operations, given the need for fewer flights home and back, and in this day of repeated trillion-dollar budget deficits, that would be a plus, even if the savings were relatively small.

It can't be a bad thing for elected officials to be more available for contact by their constituents. Both accountability and performance would improve.

Another Modern Day Prometheus ... J. D. Longstreet

Another Modern Day Prometheus   ...   J. D. Longstreet
Another Modern Day Prometheus
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

**************

It is said that Global Warming is the greatest hoax ever played upon mankind.  

Coming in a very close second is -- the need for a Department of Homeland Security -- the greatest hoax ever played upon the people of the United States.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why we ever thought we needed such a department in the first place.  Its creation is the very apex of examples of knee-jerk reactions. 

At the time DHS was created, we already had more than enough intelligence agencies.  The problem was -- they were not coordinating with each other -- at least as far as intelligence gathered referencing terrorism and the physical, geographical, place on the globe we call home -- America.

That could have been fixed, repaired, made whole.  But that is not the way Progressives/Statists/Socialists who absolutely adore BIG government think.  THEY think MORE government, expanded power over the people, MORE taxpayer money to squander, and, well, you get the picture. 

DHS is the crown jewel in the "tiara" of the American left.  With DHS they get darn near everything they need to control the populace of America.

And consider this:  The goal, at the creation of the DHS, was stated as -- allowing the top intelligence agencies (commonly thought of as the FBI and the CIA)  to coordinate and "talk" with each other far easier, and with more regularity, than before DHS.  But -- when you look closely at the formulation of the agencies under the DHS umbrella today -- the FBI and the CIA are STILL independent of DHS.   (Cue the sighing and the eye-rolling!)

 Columnist Glen Greenwald, in an article back in 2011,  called it “Exaggerating, manipulating and exploiting the Terrorist threat for profit and power.”  Here's what Greenwald said then:  "Exaggerating, manipulating and exploiting the Terrorist threat for profit and power has been the biggest scam of the decade; only Wall Street’s ability to make the Government prop it up and profit from the crisis it created at the expense of everyone else can compete for that title. Nothing has altered the mind set of the American citizenry more than a decade’s worth of fear-mongering So compelling is fear-based propaganda, so beholden are our government institutions to these private Security State factions, and so unaccountable is the power bestowed by these programs, that even a full decade after the only Terrorist attacks on U.S. soil,* its growth continues more or less unabated.”  (*Editor's note:  Remember this article was written before the Boston Bombing.) SOURCE:  http://www.salon.com/2011/08/29/terrorism_39/

" ... while the Security State has little to do with addressing ostensible Terrorist threats, it has much to do with targeting perceived domestic and political threats, especially threats brought about by social unrest from austerity and the growing wealth gap." says Greenwald. 

Then Greenwald zeros in on the concern of many Americans about DHS today. He continues: " ...  the prime aim of the growing Surveillance State is to impose domestic order, preserve prevailing economic prerogatives and stifle dissent and anticipated unrest."  SOURCE:  http://www.salon.com/2011/08/29/terrorism_39/

Liberty News Network (LNN) national correspondent and law-enforcement advocate, Andy Ramirez, in an article at thenewamerican.com was quoted as saying:  "Agencies like CBP, ICE, TSA, and the like were placed under DHS' roof for command and control purposes.  However the real purpose has been to keep the facts from reaching the public. In point of fact, DHS is a propaganda ministry in its own right, given the blatant misinformation released by top officials. In the wrong hands it could easily act in a way similar to ‘State Security’.”  SOURCE:  http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/14941-homeland-security-demands-obedience-in-message-to-agents

The concern of many Americans today is whether the US government has any real intention of protecting citizens from terrorism.
Or, is the goal to harness it, and actually use terror as a political tool of oppression against its own people.

Consider the following:  "The DHS serves only one purpose. It shows the American people the Feds are "doing something" about terrorism. But that is a lie . . .

The two agencies most responsible for failure to coordinate and "connect the dots" before 9/11 are the FBI and CIA. Yet neither the CIA nor the FBI (a domestic agency) has been placed under the DHS umbrella. This makes a coordinated, DHS-led antiterrorism strategy impossible. Leaving FBI and CIA out defeats the very purpose of the DHS.

As if that's not bad enough, taxpayers are defrauded too. Only 25% of DHS anti-terrorism "grants" to local governments goes to actual terrorism prevention and response. DHS is a definitional example of pork-barrel politics -- a Department of Porkland Security."


The article continues:

"The crimes of the DHS's Transportation Security Agency (TSA) are well-known. DownsizeDC.org already has a campaign against this heinous agency.

But there are even more ominous developments which threaten your civil liberties.

For instance, the DHS is funding a "pre-crime" program called FAST.  This "Minority Report" styled boondoggle conducts experiments to "predict whether a person will commit a crime."

 DHS is betting on algorithms: it’s building a 'prototype screening facility' that it hopes will use factors such as ethnicity, gender, breathing, and heart rate to 'detect cues indicative of mal-intent.'


It gets worse.

The DHS provides funding for unaccountable "fusion centers." These are state, local, and regional intelligence information centers created to help share information between law enforcement agencies. There's little or no actual coordination or sharing of information between fusion centers and the FBI. Fusion centers can actually undermine FBI anti-terrorism efforts because they duplicate the work of the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Forces.

Fusion centers have issued politically-charged "threat reports." The DHS itself has also issued its own threat assessments. Among these various reports, we find that potential terrorists can be recruited from . . .

Student groups at historically black colleges

Politically active Islamic groups

Members of third parties, including
Libertarian, Constitution, and Green parties
Pro-life AND pro-choice groups
   
Environmentalists and anti-war activists
   
Tea Party AND anti-Tea Party groups (one could rightfully expect that Occupy has recently made it into of these assessments)

That is to say, ANYONE who dissents or is dissatisfied with the Status Quo might be a terrorist. Such assessments reflect the paranoid minds of Statist bureaucrats and their political bosses, rather than reality.

Will the combination of pre-crime boondoggles and "fusion" assessments provide the basis for infiltration into the private lives and activities of ALL peaceful people?"
  We recommend you read this article ("Abolish the Homeland Security Department") in its entirety at: https://secure.downsizedc.org/etp/dhs/

This scribe has made no secret of my distaste for the DHS from day one.  I have noted, numerous times, how the very name of the agency conjures up memories of 1930's Germany. 

Well, the folks at "Downsize DC" (https://secure.downsizedc.org/etp/dhs/
) clearly agree with me. They say:  "... the word "homeland" is offensive. It evokes the "blood and soil" patriotism of European-style nationalism or totalitarianism rather than the American patriotism traditionally understood as devotion to republican liberty. One has to wonder, was the initial use of the word "homeland" intentional? . . . is it conditioning us for the collar of tyrannical rule?"  SOURCE: https://secure.downsizedc.org/etp/dhs/

Abolishing the Department of Homeland Security is an idea whose time came rather a while ago.  The question now is whether this parasite can be eradicated -- without killing the host -- America.

You may recall that a young English novelist, named Mary Shelly, wrote of just such a problem we face in America today in her book titled:  "The Modern Prometheus."  You may recognize the book better by its later, more popular, title:  "Frankenstein."

© J. D. Longstreet

Stock Market Complacency Déjà Vu

The following chart shows corporate profits divided by wage and salary disbursements going back to 1947. I have added three trend lines for your consideration.


Click to enlarge.

Other than being near the very top of an exponential trend channel that cannot mathematically even exist long-term, what could possibly go wrong? And for those who think the exponential trend channel is sustainable, I would ask how corporate profits can someday exceed wages?

In my opinion, this is simply an accident waiting to happen. I expect a return to the blue trend line at some point in my lifetime, perhaps even many points.

In related news, I was driving back from 4th of July activities. Complacency struck me at a rest stop. I expected rest. What I got was a somewhat different outcome. I exited my vehicle and walked about 10'. My foot slid off the curb to the right and my body fell to the left. I sprained my ankle to the point I required a trip to the emergency room once I got home (250 miles away). I am now on crutches, much like this supposedly strong and resilient economy of ours. Sigh.

The good news is that unlike our economy over the last decade or so, I did not actually break anything.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Bangkok Cab Driver Fatally Hacked American With Machete Over $1.60 Taxi Fare

Troy L. Pilkington and Cherdchai Utamacha

50-year-old American refused to pay a $1.60 cab fare and then gets fatally hacked with an 18" machete by 32-year-old Bangkok cab driver.

By H. Nelson Goodson
July 8, 2013

Bang Na, Bangkok, Thailand - On Sunday, Cherdchai Utamacha, 32, a taxi driver from the Roi Et province was arrested and charged with murder and having a weapon in public for last Saturday's homicide of Troy Lee Pilkington, 50, from California, a U.S. citizen living in Thailand, the Bangkok Post reported. Utamacha picked up Pilkington at a Bang Na store and was taking him home.
They came upon a traffic jam and the cab meter was still running. Pilkington got out of the taxi and yelled at Utamacha that he was cheating him because he believed the meter was rigged. When Utamacha got out of the taxi and tried to charge Pilkington the 51 baht that he owed ($1.60 U.S. dollars), Pilkington threw an empty cup of coffee at the driver.
Utamacha went to the back of his taxi and took out an 12" machete and got into a confrontation with Pilkington. Pilkington tried to take the machete from Utamacha, but the taxi driver began to hit Pilkington with the machete. Pilkington died at the scene and part of the incident was caught by a store surveillance camera.
Pilkington's body was found in front of a clothing store.
Police say, Utamacha got rid of the machete and a bloodied shirt at two separate places. The taxi driver confessed to killing Pilkington and police were able to recover the machete and shirt for evidence. 
Utamacha fled the scene and didn't think he killed Pilkington. He told police that he had panic when they struggled and hit Pilkington several times with the machete during the altercation.
Pilkington lived in Thailand for three years and was living with his girlfriend. He spoke fluent Thai and worked for Caterpillar, Inc., according to police.

OP- Art Prints





                                                         A "little"endless blue post.
                                                     This dress and the view complement each other so great, don't you think?




                                                                   
                                                                                    Dress: c/o Lulu's.com/ Here
                                                                                    Sandas: Zara/ option Here and Here 
                                                                                    Sunglasses: Ralph Lauren
                                                                                    Necklace: c/o Cooee/ Here