Daily news sites| Find Breaking World News
Latest Updates

A “Mill Hill” Boy’s Reflection ... J. D. Longstreet

A “Mill Hill” Boy’s Reflection    ...   J. D. Longstreet
A “Mill Hill” Boy’s Reflection 
Life Lessons Learned  
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet 
 ******************



I spent my days as a wee lad in a company house on a company lot beside a company street in a company village.  The company furnished the water and electricity … and my dad’s job.



There were four of us in that house:  My mom and dad, my younger brother, and myself.



The house had three rooms and a path … literally.  No bathroom, but there was a toilet (an “outhouse” – a “privy”) down that path.  There was also a small stable for a milk cow.



Later, the company decided to bless its employees with a bathroom in, or on, the house.  In our case the bathroom was built on the back porch so that in order to use it one still had to exit the house and cross the porch to get to it.  It had the all too common porcelain toilet and a shower.  There was no lavatory, or sink, in that bathroom. There was a small push-out window near the ceiling of the room.   It was hot in the summer and absolutely frigid in the winter.



Between the house and the outhouse there was a huge cast iron wash pot in which mom did the laundry every Monday.  Wire clotheslines were strung across the backyard so that making an emergency trip to the outhouse at night was akin to maneuvering an army obstacle course -- blindfolded.  It was here that I learned the importance of having a flashlight readily available at night.  I do – to this day.    



The lighting in each room of the house was a single electric wire, hanging from the middle of the ceiling, with a socket for a single light bulb and -- a string attached to the pull chain -- as the only switch to turn the light on and off.  There were no electric receptacles anywhere in the rooms.  That single socket was the only source of electricity in every room.



As was everything in those latitudes (upstate South Carolina – the Piedmont/

foothills), the house was on the side of a hill. The front porch was at near ground level while a man of average height could walk, unstooped, underneath the back of the house.  In fact, that is where we stored our firewood for the stove and wash pot fires and coal for the fireplaces that had coal grates in them instead of dogs for burning wood.



As I mentioned, a good portion of the wood underneath the house was for mom’s huge cast iron wood range cooking stove.  It was a monster!  The thing would heat a city block when the fire got going. (The best food I have ever had, in my life, was cooked on that wood range.)



To get some relief from the heat in the kitchen in the summer, we had to raise the room’s two windows, one on the south side of the room and the other on the east side, and prop them open with pieces of firewood.



The kitchen table was rectangular and covered with an oilcloth tablecloth. That table was the center of our family universe.



There was an icebox.  I mean a REAL icebox.  It was my job to see that it didn’t run out of ice.  I had to walk a city block, and a bit more, to a community grocery store (every day) and purchase a block of ice (for five cents), which the grocer man placed in my little red Radio Flyer wagon that I used to haul that slippery, heavy, cargo. 



Then there was the drip pan beneath the icebox that had to be emptied at least once a day, or more, depending upon how hot the kitchen got on any given day. 



The kitchen was the family room.  The other two rooms were for sleeping.



The house was set back, ten or twelve feet, from the cement sidewalk.  My earliest memories have the street itself unpaved, but later it WAS paved with the old macadam mixture of round smooth river rock and tar.  It stunk to high heaven when it was hot and would blister the bottoms of your bare feet.



The rent was a dollar a day.



We were poor.  But then, so were all our neighbors -- so nobody seemed to notice.



It was on that block that I learned to fend for myself.  It was on that block that I learned to fight, lie, cheat, steal, curse, and the most wondrous thing of all … that girls are different from boys.  I also learned that I like girls … a lot!  



The block was awash in children, or “younguns,” as they were called in those days.  In my house, my younger brother and I were referred to as “chaps.”



It was on that block that I was cold-cocked, knocked unconscious, when I ran headlong into a China Berry tree while chasing a fly ball.



It was there that I learned, mostly, (I admit) by trial and error, right from wrong.  It was on that block that the basic building blocks of what passes today for my character were forever molded.



When we moved to a four-room house in another mill village across town, I wept. 



I will always be a Mill Hill boy.  It is in my blood and maybe -- in my DNA.



The Mill Hill is where I came to know and understand poor working people … people who live their lives on the very edge of out and out destitution. It is where I learned self-reliance.  It is also where I decided that I would claw my way to a better future through hard work; determination, stubbornness, and perseverance taught me by my father’s example.



It was on that Mill Hill where I learned that you must be ready to take a stand and defend your position from all comers regardless of the clamor of the opposition.



The Mill Hill was tough and it was not fair.  I learned, on that Mill Hill, that life is truly NOT FAIR.  But, most importantly, I learned that life is not supposed to be fair!! I learned that crying out for fairness was only an excuse for a shortcut to one’s goals.



That Mill Hill taught me that if one truly wants to make something of one’s self then you first must forget “fair.”  You play the hand you are dealt.  But you play it with cunning and skill and perseverance.  And you NEVER, EVER, QUIT because you are never beaten ‘til you quit!



And finally, I learned, on that Mill Hill, one should never compromise when one is satisfied that he/she is right.  Compromise neuters one’s self-reliance.  When you believe -- to an absolute certainty -- that you are right, compromise is nothing less than a personal sell-out.



Some will disagree with the life lessons I learned on the Mill Hill, but that’s OK.  They are MY lessons. And they have served me well.  After all, it was the hand I was dealt over 70 years ago, and I am still in the game!


J. D. Longstreet

Five

Five
I'm now in 5th place on Rocksmith's Scale Runner mini-game (PS3 version). My absence here has not gone unrewarded.

I ran scales for two hours on the couch yesterday while watching War of the Worlds (again). I also made two attempts to get a better score within the game. The first attempt earlier in the day was a dud. I played well but just couldn't find the speed. The second attempt paid off. Hit 272 notes in a row on two different scales, 271 on another, 270 notes on six more, and 268 on the remaining two. As seen in the link below, 268 notes in 100 seconds was my top speed just a few weeks ago.

Overall, that's nearly 8 hours of guitar practice in one day. Needless to say, my fingers sure are numb!

I don't know what my ultimate top speed will be, but I really don't think that I've peaked yet. If I can go just a fraction of one percent faster (while speeding up my slower scales, which will definitely happen with more practice), then I'll be a contender for the top spot.

See Also:
Nine

The Iron Lady Leaves Us ... J. D. Longstreet

The Iron Lady Leaves Us   ...   J. D. Longstreet
The Iron Lady Leaves Us


Margaret Thatcher Dies
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

*************

Margaret Thatcher, Former Prime Minister of Great Britain, has passed away leaving a vast void in the ranks of conservatives the world over.

Margaret Thatcher's political career has been one of the most remarkable of modern times. Born in October 1925 at Grantham, a small market town in eastern England, she rose to become the first (and for two decades the only) woman to lead a major Western democracy. She won three successive General Elections and served as British Prime Minister for more than eleven years (1979-90), a record unmatched in the twentieth century. 

During her term of office she reshaped almost every aspect of British politics, reviving the economy, reforming outdated institutions, and reinvigorating the nation's foreign policy. She challenged and did much to overturn the psychology of decline which had become rooted in Britain since the Second World War, pursuing national recovery with striking energy and determination.

In the process, Margaret Thatcher became one of the founders, with Ronald Reagan, of a school of conservative conviction politics, which has had a powerful and enduring impact on politics in Britain and the United States and earned her a higher international profile than any British politician since Winston Churchill.
  SOURCE:  http://www.margaretthatcher.org/essential/biography.asp

Had Margaret Thatcher been born American and had she become a candidate for President of the United States, I would have supported her and voted for her.  She was a conservative.

Working closely with President Ronald Reagan,  the Iron Lady welded our two countries together as one. 

Her influence spread around the world.  Her plain spoken opinions made even the mighty squirm at times.  With Thatcher at 10 Downing Street the world never had to wonder where England stood.   

Her influence on US President George H. W. Bush was invaluable at times during his term in office.

Thatcher hated socialism.  She saw it for what it is and she loathed it.  Back in 1976 she said:  "Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them." Speech, Feb. 5, 1976

She once said:  "Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean—power over people, power to the State."

She didn't much care for socialized medicine either.  She had her own private health insurance.  When asked about that in a TV interview she said: "I, along with something like 5 million other people, insure to enable me to go into hospital on the day I want; at the time I want, and with a doctor I want. "

On socialism's effect on Great Britain, Baroness Thatcher said this:  "No theory of government was ever given a fairer test or a more prolonged experiment in a democratic country than democratic socialism received in Britain. Yet it was a miserable failure in every respect. Far from reversing the slow relative decline of Britain vis-à-vis its main industrial competitors, it accelerated it. We fell further behind them, until by 1979 we were widely dismissed as 'the sick man of Europe'...To cure the British disease with socialism was like trying to cure leukemia with leeches."

Here is one of my favorite quotes from Margaret Thatcher:  "I came to office with one deliberate intent: to change Britain from a dependent to a self-reliant society — from a give-it-to-me, to a do-it-yourself nation. A get-up-and-go, instead of a sit-back-and-wait-for-it Britain." That was from a speech she made on Feb. 8, 1984.

Compare Thatcher's philosophy against that of the current President of the US and you will quickly see why America is in such deep trouble.  Thatcher had her priorities in the proper order. 

Obama wants to rid the world of Nuclear weapons.  Thatcher understood the need for nuclear arsenals.  She said this: "A world without nuclear weapons may be a dream but you cannot base a sure defense on dreams. Without far greater trust and confidence between East and West than exists at present, a world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us."   She made those remarks in a speech at a Soviet Official banquet, St George's Halls, the Kremlin (30 March 1987).  Thatcher had the courage of her convictions.

In her book  Statecraft: Strategies for a Changing World. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 0-06-095912-6,  she laid out a list of guidelines that speak volumes about her and the way she governed.  She wrote:  "I should therefore prefer to restrict my guidelines to the following:

Don't believe that military interventions, no matter how morally justified, can succeed without clear military goals
   
Don't fall into the trap of imagining that the West can remake societies
   
Don't take public opinion for granted -- but don't either underrate the degree to which good people will endure sacrifices for a worthwhile cause
Don't allow tyrants and aggressors to get away with it

And when you fight -- fight to win.

(You will find these guidelines on page 39 of the book.)

Can you see why I would have great admiration for this great lady? 

May God grant her eternal rest. 

J. D. Longstreet

The Bear Is Tromping The Woods Again! ... J. D. Longstreet

The Bear Is Tromping The Woods Again!   ...   J. D. Longstreet
The Bear Is Tromping The Woods Again!
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

**************

The Russian  bear is raging around the globe again.  The "Russkies" are up to their old tricks once more.  Probing, tweaking, testing, aggravating, and in general -- making a complete nuisance of themselves as they strut across the world stage in what they hope is an intimidating posture to strike fear in the hearts of well, EVERYBODY. 

Russia is STILL so far behind the remainder of the world that they are pitiable.

However, if the Russians ever decide to climb out of the Vodka bottle and sober up, they could actually become the great country they SAY they want to be. 

They are a strange people.  Fearful of everything and everybody out side the borders of Russia.  As a country, they are convinced that someone is going to attack them and take their treasures. 

The United States has been the preferred target of their ire since, well, since we bade them leave the North American continent in 1867 with the purchase of Alaska from Russia's Emperor Alexander II.  They've seemed sour toward the US ever since.

OK. OK. So we DID invade Russia -- ONCE -- back during the First World War.   Oh, yes.  We did.

"Although few people know it, in 1918 President Woodrow Wilson sent 5,500 American soldiers — including some from Missouri and Kansas — to northern Russia in the last days of World War I. Thanks to harsh conditions that cut off communications, the troops were left there for eight months after the war ended."
SOURCE:  http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/11/27/104384/think-us-troops-never-invaded.html#storylink=cpy

"President Woodrow Wilson was pressured by the British to send American soldiers to Russia to fight a new force called the Bolsheviks, an early name for Communists . Winston Churchill (then Britain's secretary of war) saw that the Bolsheviks were pulling the czar's forces — our allies — out of the war as they were taking over Russia. So Churchill thought that if we could amass forces in northern Russia, we could stop communism at its birth."  Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/11/27/104384/think-us-troops-never-invaded.html#storylink=cpy

The war ended about two months after the Americans got there -- but THEY DIDN'T KNOW IT!  They were left for eight months in sometimes waist deep snow.  Many died of exposure. So, believe me when I tell you --we REALLY don't want to invade Russia -- AGAIN!  Now, if we could only convince the Russians of that!

Lately, though, the Russian military has been probing US defenses around the world -mostly in the Pacific region and down the west coast of the US.

From the Free Beacon we learn:  "A Russian bomber recently carried out simulated cruise missile attacks on U.S. missile defenses in Asia, raising new questions about Moscow’s goal in future U.S.-Russian defense talks.

According to U.S. officials, a Russian Tu-22M Backfire bomber on Feb. 26 simulated firing air-launched cruise missiles at an Aegis ship deployed near Japan as part of U.S. missile defenses.

A second mock attack was conducted Feb. 27 against a ground-based missile defense site in Japan that officials did not identify further."
  SOURCE:  http://freebeacon.com/russian-bomber-roulette/ 

From the same article in the Free Beacon we also learn: "The bomber targeting of U.S. missile defenses also followed stepped up Russian bomber activities targeting other U.S. missile defense sites, including ground-based interceptors in Alaska and California. A large-scale Russian military exercise in the Arctic in June included flights by two Tu-95 Bear bombers that Russian military officials said had simulated attacks on U.S. missile defenses in Alaska.

Another pair of Tu-95s flew on July 4 the closest to the California coast that a Russian bomber had flown since the days of the Soviet Union, when strategic bomber flights near U.S. coasts were a routine feature of the Cold War." 


This is important.  While the US is cutting back it's military and nuclear arsenal, the Russians are building up their military preparing especially for war with the US. (So is China, but that is for another day, another column.)

Winston Churchill once said that "appeasement is nothing more than feeding the alligator in hopes that he will eat you last."

While the Obama Administration is busy feeding the Russian alligator the gator is growing bigger and meaner with every passing day.

Appeasement does not work with the Russians. They will bleed you dry then eat your bones.

It seems strange that the only US President able to handle the Russians would not appease them and he brought on the collapse of the old Soviet Union.  His name was Ronald Reagan. 

There is no Reagan to deal with the Russians today.  And THEY KNOW IT!  The Russians see Obama as a joke. They are happily running circles around Obama's diplomatic team and going hell bent for leather to build up their military while the US has such a weak administration in power.

Yes, the "Russian Bear" is back prowling and growling in the woods.  This time the US is too weak to contain the bear.  It will be decades until the US has another conservative president to order a huge build-up in America's military force.  Until then, the world cannot count on the US to counter the Russians as it did for the forty-year Cold War.   Besides, the US today more closely resembles the old Soviet Union -- with our current socialist President and government -- than we do the old America. Heck, we might even be invited to join the Russian Federation. 

© J. D. Longstreet 

ATF Revokes Federal Firearm License Without Giving Cause for Its Action...

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny



Reuters - The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms said on Friday it had revoked the federal license of a Connecticut gun retailer that sold a weapon to the mother of Adam Lanza, who killed 26 people at an elementary school in December.

The agency on December 20 revoked the license of Riverview Gun Sales in East Windsor, Connecticut, ATF spokeswoman Debora Seifert said. The revocation was reported in The Journal News, of Westchester County, New York, on Friday.

"We did revoke their federal firearms license," she said. The agency did not publicly disclose a reason for the closure.

A woman who answered the telephone at Riverview on Friday, and did not give her name, confirmed the store had sold a weapon to Lanza's mother, Nancy, and that its license had been revoked. She declined further comment.

Nancy Lanza was her son's first victim in the December 14 attack. He shot her in their family home before driving to Sandy Hook Elementary School, Newtown, where he gunned down 20 young children and six adults before shooting himself dead.

The weapons Adam Lanza, 20, used in the attack were all legally purchased and registered.

(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Dale Hudson

Hm, revocation of firearm license without cause? If there was sufficient and proper cause for this revocation why isn't the government stating the reason for the revocation? Are such revocations going to become commonplace given the mood of the country and the Administration's position on 2'nd amendment rights of the citizenry to keep and bear arms?

Reasonable people are on board with rational firearm control regulations, including firearm advocates and sportsman. Extensive background checks, extended waiting periods to allow time to accomplish thorough back ground checks, waiting periods when a firearm is purchased at gun shows, regulation of high cap magazines and extended clips are all reasonable. But revoking a businesses federal firearm license without issue a statement as to the reasoning behind such revocation? That's enough to start eyebrows to raise. Even for those who support reasonable regulation while at the same time supporting the 2'nd amendment right to keep and bear arms.

We are on a slippery slope and it seems it will only get slipperier given this report.

Via: Memeorandum


Update, from CNN

Responding to criticism from the National Rifle Association over Connecticut's new gun laws, Gov. Dan Malloy argued the pro-gun group's executive vice president, Wayne LaPierre, is simply blowing smoke.

"Wayne reminds me of the clowns at the circus - they get the most attention. That's what he's paid to do," Malloy said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union."

The Democratic governor on Thursday signed into law some of the nation's strictest gun regulations, following the state's devastating school shooting in December in Newtown, which left 20 children and six adults dead.

The new Connecticut laws include the addition of more than 100 weapons to the state’s list of banned assault weapons - including the semiautomatic Bushmaster rifle, one of the firearms used in the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. The law also bans the sale of magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, as well as armor-piercing bullets. Buyers will need a certificate to buy ammunition.

It also requires background checks for all gun purchases.

LaPierre said this week that the only people who will follow the new regulations are law-abiding gun owners, not criminals.

"I think the problem with what Connecticut did is the criminals, the drug dealers, the people that are going to do horror and terror, they aren't going to cooperate," LaPierre said on Fox News. "I mean, all you're doing is making the lawbooks bigger for the law-abiding people."

Asked who will be most affected by the new laws, Malloy said they'll be "probably a little tougher on everybody."

"This guy is so out of whack, it's unbelievable," Malloy told CNN's chief political correspondent, Candy Crowley, referring to LaPierre.

Connecticut became the third state to pass tough measures since the December rampage in Newtown. New York and Colorado passed gun control legislation limiting magazine capacity, among other provisions.

Malloy pointed to the fact that the overwhelming majority of Americans favor the idea of more background checks, a proposal found in legislation currently sitting before the U.S. Senate. The NRA, however, opposes that bill. {Continue Reading}

I agree, LaPierre can certainly be the clown.

Via: Memeorandum

North Korea ready to launch a missile



A top South Korean national security official said Sunday that North Korea may be setting the stage for a missile test or another provocative act with its warning that it soon will be unable to guarantee diplomats' safety in Pyongyang. But he added that the North's clearest objective is to extract concessions from Washington and Seoul.

Read Full Article Here

Neon alert





Hello sunny Sunday, hello everyone!
I have for you today a neon-khaky- leopard print outfit post and also the winner of the SweepStreet Jewelry giveaway. Congrats to Tanya Soyer. Soon I will contact you for more informations.
Thank you everyone for your participation and have a wonderful rest of the day.
I hope you enjoyed this post!






                                                                                   Coat: Joe Fresh/ Here
                                                                                   Top: H&M/ option Here 
                                                                                   Jeans: thanks to Tokyo LaundryHere
                                                                                   Bag: thanks to Meredith WendellHere
                                                                                   Shoes: Daniblack/ option Here
                                                                                   Sunglasses: Ray Ban
                                                                                   Neckalce: Ananda thanks to Sweep Street JewelryHere


The President Catches Hell for Speaking the Truth... Appologizes

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny


There seems to be a food fight over just who is the best looking Attorney General in these United States of America.

For the opposition view point you can find it here.

Kamala Harris

















Pam Bondi



















The Winner Is...

Drum roll............................

Kamala Harris by a Landslide!


I for one Mr. President understand. But as you found out... in this day and age it just ain't politically correct to use such flattering language when talking about a beautiful, intelligent, and accomplished women.

Via: Memeorandum

40.9 Million Missing Jobs (Musical Tribute)


Click to enlarge.

If the exponential trend failure in that chart hasn't made you gasp in horror then please feel free to examine the following short-term chart closely. There's hope for a good scream yet!


Click to enlarge.

What does this mean?

First, as I have been saying for more than a year, we aren't going to make it back to the long-term (1939 to present) median growth trend this time. And why not? It's an "unexpectedly" weak recovery of course. Duh!

Second, it is definitely time for a musical tribute in honor of yet another economic nail potentially being hammered into the labor market's long-term coffin. The odds of us reversing the downward trend established over the last few years is infinitesimally small in my opinion. The new downward trend is not our friend. Few seem to even notice it, much less talk about it. It was nothing but rationalization after rationalization on CNBC today.



Run to the hills!
Run for your lives!

That's about the most advice I would ever dare to offer on this site. I am as bearish on our economy right now as I have ever been. The second chart reminds me in no small part of what the economy looked like when I started this blog back in the fall of 2007 (right down to, in my opinion, the unsustainable stock market euphoria over unsustainable corporate profits).

The bond market sure hasn't bought the rose-colored glasses theory though. Just look at those low yields. As a side note, if this latest employment report is any indicator then so much for the supposed bond bubble popping any time soon. And how about all those hyperinflation predictions? Good luck on those theories too. Probably not gonna happen, at least in the short-term. In the long-term, we're all dead of course.

And on that note, they can pry the long-term TIPS, I-Bonds, and EE-Bonds from my cold dead fingers. Who are they? They are the bond vigilantes of course. They can't ever seem to BUY enough, much to the ongoing dismay of Jeremy Siegel.

As economic growth recovers and real rates rise, the price of Tips will fall leaving Tips investors with large losses in the face of accelerating inflation. - Jeremy Siegel, February 2, 2011

What a frickin' joke that was... every part of it. The 20-Year TIPS yielded 1.82% that day. Today it yields just -0.03%. Yes, that truly is a negative sign in front of it. So much for the recovering economic growth fueling rising real rates theory.

All these questionable recovering prosperity theories need to be taken out behind the woodshed. It pains me to say it, but they need to rest in peace. Sigh.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: All Employees: Total nonfarm

Whatever Happened To Faith? ... J. D. Longstreet

Whatever Happened To Faith?   ...   J. D. Longstreet
Whatever Happened To Faith?
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet



If I may be allowed, I'd like to paraphrase Saint Paul (I believe it was) who said:  "Faith is the belief in things not seen."  What Paul actually said is this:  "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."

Therein, I think, is the problem for the Christian religion today.  Even the evangelicals are beginning to lose their way. 

We live in a time dominated by science, which has made huge advancements in practically every field of science man can think of -- or devise.  One could argue , I think, that modern man has shifted his reliance off God and onto science.  This is a scenario not unlike those I used to read in science fiction books as a lad. 

Man (the human species) rebelled against his creator from the beginning choosing the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil over the protection and guidance of his Maker.  It was man's downfall then and it continues to be our downfall today -- driving us farther and farther away from our true salvation and into the arms of a counterfeit god -- science.

This presents a near insurmountable problem for the human animal -- how to sustain faith in things not seen and yet rely on science to provide the proof of those very same things. 

It is an impossible dream.  And it is a dream that has been a nightmare for man, a nightmare which he refuses to recognize and from which he refuses to awaken. 

There has been a theory for centuries now that like matter and anti-matter science and faith are explosive when in the same environment.  There is  no room in science for faith.  He who chooses science forsakes faith.  He must, for they cannot coexist in the context of religion.  I think that theory is flat-out wrong!

As a young man, I had the great experience of helping found two churches.  The first from the ground up -- literally.  We few who began the church met on Sunday mornings in a wooded lot on the outskirts of town.  We had worship services out in the open -- the greatest of all cathedrals. 

Then the membership built a small wooden building which served as the sanctuary.  Even the pews were made from unpainted pine two by fours.  They were uncomfortable, but serviceable.  It took years of hard work and dedication but now that church is one of the largest congregations in town with a beautiful brick and mortar building to rival any in the city.   But I doubt many of its members today have any inkling of its humble beginnings.

The second was a Lutheran church that was begun in the living room of my home.   This time we had loans and grants to get us off the ground and chartered.  One of the proudest moments of my life was the Sunday morning my wife and I signed the church charter and became "charter members."

Both these churches were possible because men and women of faith saw a need and sought to fill that need with faith in the evidence of those unseen things Saint Paul spoke of thousands of years ago.

Today, I no longer attend church -- at all.  Frankly, I became disgusted with the leftist agenda introduced by the hierarchy of the church into what had been a community of faith whose belief were summed up by the  Great Commission of Christ and the Apostle's Creed.  

Soon, however, the Marxist doctrine of social justice was pushing out the worship of God and replacing it with the worship of the political leftist agenda,  including the pagan worship of the earth and nature rather than the earth's creator and nature's God.  It became, in my opinion, apostate, and I had no choice but to follow St. Paul's advice to Timothy to "come out from among them."  And I did.

Understand.  I did not leave The Church.  I am right where I have always been in my relationship with God.  The church left me -- because I refused to compromise my religious belief, my religious faith, and accept the counterfeit belief that rendering unto Caesar and rendering unto God are one and the same thing.  

The mainline denominations, especially, forsook the faith in exchange for politics and science. 

I was not, and am not, alone.  Thousands left, as well, from many denominations when they realized that the emptiness they felt at the close of the worship services was a hunger for the things of God that were no longer provided in those houses formerly erected for specifically that purpose.

The Christian faith has been under attack since Jesus Christ delivered His very first sermon. Today, however, the attack is far more subtle than just feeding the lions.  In many ways, it is far more sinister and, indeed, vastly more effective.

The various "liberation theologies," the scientific approach to the scriptures, the insistence that the Christian faith embrace "social justice" as the work of the church,  are seductive -- and like a black hole they suck into them those floundering around desperately seeking something to believe in.

I submit that if the modern Christian churches were fulfilling their mission,  this would not be happening -- at least to the degree it is today.

While I'm at it, lets get something clear.  Jesus was not a Communist nor a Marxist.  And He certainly was not black.  He was a Jew -- a practicing Jew. 

Have you ever wondered --  if Jesus visited your town this weekend, which church he would attend?  He wouldn't.  He'd go to the local synagogue. 

We have distanced ourselves so far from the specificity of the scriptures and the reality of the world as it was over two thousand years ago that we have lost sight of what was/is real.

Man comes into this world hard-wired with a yearning for God.  And when he cannot find Him, he creates a god.  Unfortunately, he creates a god in his own image ... the image of man.  And that god fails -- every time -- to fill the void in the yearning soul.

So we create religions and cults that are based on the likes and desires of mankind and not on the infallible truths of the one and only Creator of mankind.  It's as if rather than going to the one lit candle in a darkened room we fight for our little piece of the darkness.  It is madness.  And madness begets madness.

Even when the ferocity of hurricane winds sweep through our darkness that candle continues to burn brightly, not threatened by the darkness, not threatened by the winds, and not threatened by us.   It is steady, bright, warm, and ever present.

Because we do not know what unseen hand placed that candle in the blackness of our lives we dare not approach.  We fight the urge to gravitate to its warmth.

To accept the brightness, the warmth, the welcome of that candle, we have to accept that someone, unseen, placed it there to provide comfort for us in our darkened peril.  That acceptance is our salvation.  The belief in things unseen.  That candle is the evidence of things unseen.  A power greater than ourselves. 

We call that "faith" and there is precious little left in mankind any more.

Everything we have, everything we are, everything we may become, can all be swept away in an instant into the black nothingness -- save for those who have faith in the unseen hand that placed that light in their darkness.

I have often thought that man's salvation would have been easier to accept had there been a price tag attached.  But then I remember -- there was a price.  It was a price so great no mere mortal could ever pay

It is offered to man pre-paid -- because Christ picked up the tab some two thousand years ago on a desolate, wind swept, knoll just outside the walls of a city named Jerusalem in a place we call Israel today.  He died there from torture.  Seventy-two hours later, Christians believe, he walked out of his formerly sealed tomb and sealed the deal between man and their God.  From that day forward nothing would come between man and his God, not even death --  except, of course, things that man, himself, placed there.

We've been building obstructions ever since.  All, too often, I believe, we use science as a major obstruction. 

Look.  I believe God created the heavens and the earth.  I simply don't care if it was six 24-hour days or six thousands-of-years-long days.  It doesn't matter.

There really are questions for which man has no answer and will NEVER have an answer. 

But we have faith.  

Whatever happened to faith?  It's still here, though fewer and fewer lay claim to it today.  We are told in the biblical account of the "end-time" that the faithful will have been whittled down to only a remnant -- just a few remaining.  With the rapidity with which the faithful are diminishing today one must wonder if the true end-time has accelerated its approach.

I have learned that with advancing years it is not necessarily true that men grow wiser.  Turns out -- it's optional.   There is a direct correlation between wisdom and faith, I think.  The wise man should never abandon his faith and the man of faith should never refuse an increase in wisdom. 

Science should never be an impediment to faith.  Science, in its purest form, is merely a search for wisdom.   Faith is the acceptance that there exists a wisdom far superior to ours, which is responsible for that seed of yearning for knowledge of the unknown, the unseen,  and ultimately -- for our very existence.

I have no problem with that.  You see, I have faith.

J. D. Longstreet

President Obama Acting as a President and the Nation's CEO Should...

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny




President Obama acting like a true leader and Chief Executive Officer of the United States of America should act. Infuriating the progressive wing of his party he has signaled his willingness to address Social Security and Medicare cuts.

The New York Times - President Obama next week will take the political risk of formally proposing cuts to Social Security and Medicare in his annual budget in an effort to demonstrate his willingness to compromise with Republicans and revive prospects for a long-term deficit-reduction deal, administration officials say.

In a significant shift in fiscal strategy, Mr. Obama on Wednesday will send a budget plan to Capitol Hill that departs from the usual presidential wish list that Republicans typically declare dead on arrival. Instead it will embody the final compromise offer that he made to Speaker John A. Boehner late last year, before Mr. Boehner abandoned negotiations in opposition to the president’s demand for higher taxes from wealthy individuals and some corporations.

Congressional Republicans have dug in against any new tax revenues after higher taxes for the affluent were approved at the start of the year. The administration’s hope is to create cracks in Republicans’ antitax resistance, especially in the Senate, as constituents complain about the across-the-board cuts in military and domestic programs that took effect March 1.

Mr. Obama’s proposed deficit reduction would replace those cuts. And if Republicans continue to resist the president, the White House believes that most Americans will blame them for the fiscal paralysis.

Besides the tax increases that most Republicans continue to oppose, Mr. Obama’s budget will propose a new inflation formula that would have the effect of reducing cost-of-living payments for Social Security benefits, though with financial protections for low-income and very old beneficiaries, administration officials said. The idea, known as chained C.P.I., has infuriated some Democrats and advocacy groups to Mr. Obama’s left, and they have already mobilized in opposition.  {Read More}
Hm, the left wing of the President's party (the progressive extremists) are mobilizing against his budget proposal. Could it be rEpublicans have their best chance at being part of a rational step in the right directions by working with the President? It sure as hell seems so to me. Now we wait and see how it plays out.

I'm betting if the rEpublican party power structure digs their heels in the no new tax thingamajig America will toss the prey big wigs into the dust heap of political history. Which is of course exactly as it should be. IMNHO...

Via: Memeorandum

let's play hooky

Spring has finally arrived so I'm off to play hooky today. I'm wrapping up two client projects this weekend and I'll have a surprise to share on Monday (tease). Follow along on instagram for sneak peaks.

But for now, I'm off to enjoy some time with these two crazy girls.


I'll see y'all back here on Monday. Have a great weekend!

Blue jeans & Red lips





Blue jeans & red lips is a quite a combination, right? I wore this outfit a few weeks ago and I find it so fun and feminine... nothing compares with one (or more) RED bold accents.



                                                                               Coat: thrift store/ option Here 
                                                                               Jeans: Levis/ option Here
                                                                               Heels: Shoemint/ another color Here 
                                                                               Shirt: thanks to SheinsideHere
                                                                               Clutch: American Apparel/ in all the colors Here 
                                                                               Sunglasses: Ray Ban




How To To Rain Down Destruction On Your Country ... J. D. Longstreet

How To To Rain Down Destruction On Your Country   ...   J. D. Longstreet
How To To Rain Down Destruction On Your Country
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

*****************

Twenty-eight(?) year old Kim Jong Un, North Korea's "leader" has very nearly talked himself into a corner.  A corner that may well destroy what is left of North Korea, or as they refer to their country:  The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea ... The DPRK.

Kim has blustered and played the role of a spoiled brat in the grip of a monumental tantrum on the world's stage for months now.  He has baited South Korea and the US and managed to "PO" China, his only real ally in the region.  China has recently moved troops up to the border of North Korea, ostensibly to stop an expected flood of North Korean refugees from fleeing into China seeking refuge from American and South Korea bombs and missiles.

The latest threats out of the "Hermit Kingdom," as of the morning of April 4th, 2012, is to strike the US mainland with nuclear missiles, which North Korean troops moved to North Korea's Eastern Border in a show of preparation.

I have been analyzing, as best I can, US troops, ships, aircraft, and sundry war fighting materiel movements, and I see a plan of action developing.  At least I THINK I do.  

It seems to me the US and South Korea ARE planning to strike North Korea at the first North Koran slip-up.  Something as small as, oh, say -- a border skirmish, a firefight between troops of the Koreas.  Whatever it is, whenever it occurs, the dogs of war will be unleashed and all hell will break loose for North Korea.
I expect the US/South Korean forces to take out North Koreas command and control enters instantly, in the twinkling of an eye. North Koreas nuclear plants and all nuclear facilities north of the 38th parallel, will be destroyed completely.  Military -- high command -- headquarters will be flattened. Bunkers will be destroyed by those US bunker buster bombs,  Every missile emplacement in North Korea will be sought out and destroyed. Those mobile missiles mounted on trucks will be hunted down by drones firing hellfire missiles and they, too, will be destroyed.  

There is a better than even chance that the cream of North Korea's military leadership will be killed in the first few minutes of the attack.

Those are just a few of the things one can expect in the first few minutes of the first wave of attacks.

Oh, just so our friend in the Middle East doesn't feel left out, our forces surrounding Iran will be on high alert ready to take care of business should Iran see this as an opportune moment to "kick outside the traces" and stir up trouble to "divide" America's attention.

North Korea will be no pushover, but it will be crushed.  With the world's fourth largest military, including  the world's largest special operations force, North Korea has a substantial military with 1,700 planes, 800 ships, and 4,000 tanks.  It also has one of the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons in the world -- and -- it has nuclear weapons.

Not much is reported on the South Korean military.  But, I must tell you, I have great respect for the ROK military -- Army, Navy, and Air Force. (ROK = Republic of Korea) 

Little known is the fact that the Republic of Korea Army is one of the largest standing armies in the world and one of the best trained and equipped -- and experienced with a reported personnel strength of 3,539,000 in 2012 (639,000 active force and 2,900,000 regular reserve), and additional 300,000 paramilitary. They can -- and they WILL --  stand and fight!

ROK forces have fought in the Korean War (1950-1953), the Vietnam War (1964-1973), the Persian Gulf War (1991), the War in Afghanistan (2001-present), and the Iraq War (2003-2008). 

They don't brag and they don't bluster -- they FIGHT.  Even without US backing, North Korea would have a hell of a time handling their cousins to the south in an all out war. 

South Korea's cities have been planning since the 1950's to create havoc for an invading army from the north.  For instance all bridges and traffic viaducts are mined and will be blown up and dropped to ground level immediately to stop or, at least, delay North Korean armor such as tanks, APC's, towed artillery,  etc., from advancing southward.  And that is just one of the preparations the South Koreans have made.  There is more -- much more.

God help "Little Kim" if Japan is dragged into his fray. The Japanese Self Defense Forces  numbered 239,430 in 2005 with 147,737 in the Ground Self-Defense Force, 44,327 in the Maritime Self-Defense Force, 45,517 in the Air Self-Defense Force, and 1,849 in the Joint Staff Office. Reserves numbered 57,899.

Japanese law states that ground, maritime, and air forces are to preserve the peace and independence of the nation and to maintain national security by conducting operations on land, at sea, and in the air to defend the nation against direct and indirect aggression.  In cases of limited and small-scale attack, Japanese forces will respond promptly to control the situation. If enemy forces attacked in greater strength than Japan can  counter alone, the JSDF (Japanese Self Defense Forces) will engage the attacker until the United States can come to its aid. Against nuclear threat, Japan would rely on the nuclear deterrence of the United States. To accomplish its missions, the SDF would maintain surveillance, be prepared to respond to direct and indirect attacks, be capable of providing command, communication, logistics, and training support, and be available to aid in disaster relief.

If the modern Japanese warrior has even a small percentage of the warrior spirit of his grandfather and great grandfather, he is one hell of a soldier. Frankly, I suspect that he does.

 Kim should understand that US plans for the total destruction of his country were laid out many decades ago and updated as necessary since.  If he is foolish enough to attack, there will be no delay in a counter attack by US and South Korean forces.  It will be immediate and awesome.

If North Korea is stupid enough to launch a nuclear attack on America. American territories, or any of America bases around the world, it would be suicide for his country.

Given that North Korea has been such a thorn in the flesh to the US, South Korea, Japan, and indeed, the world for so long now, I would not be surprised if a war with North Korea would be fought until North Korea sues for peace and offers an unconditional surrender.

The time, and the opportunity, may have come to rid the world of the malignancy of the DPRK.

© J. D. Longstreet

Garbage In, Garbage Out

The following chart shows real annualized total public construction spending on sewage and waste disposal per capita (February 2013 dollars).


Click to enlarge.

I know this sounds crazy, but ever since yesterday on the road, I've been seeing this shape. Shaving cream, pillows. Dammit! I know this. I know what this is! This means something. This is important. - Roy Neary, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, 1977

See Also:
Wikipedia: Garbage in, garbage out

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Making Sense Objectively of the Absurd...

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny


Everywhere in today's liberal, or progressive lexicon we hear of the evils inherent in Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand. Indeed the general consensus, or so it seems to this individual, is that Ayn Rand herself was an evil person.

So, perhaps some object liberal, or progressive can explain the evil in the following...


Thank You...

I'd Like To Think So...

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny


Chris Pizzello/Associated Press
Patti Davis in 2004. 
She says her father would have supported same-sex marriage.

None of us know for certain whether President Ronald Wilson Reagan would have supported marriage equality. In the world of politics public opinion is often the prime mover of such things. It shouldn't be.

I would like to believe Patti Davis is right. If conservatives accept her belief that her father would have supported marriage equality perhaps it will be easier for them to accept that doing so is, in fact, the right thing to do.

For those who truly respect the rights of all to live their life in such a way as to secure their own happiness, which is to embrace individual liberty, the acceptance of marriage equality should be a no brainier.

Note: The preceding reference to individual liberty is not meant to imply anything goes without respect to civil society and the restraints required to maintain civil order.

Justice, to be realized means affording the same civil rights to all individuals across the board without regard to ones race, national heritage, gender, sexual preference, physical or mental disability, or anything else that righty falls under the umbrella of individual liberty and the proper exercise thereof.

The New York Times As Republican politicians wrestle with same-sex marriage, the daughter of a party icon — former President Ronald Reagan — said in an interview this week that she believes her father would have “been puzzled” by the political fuss and would have supported marriage for gay people.

Patti Davis, a Los Angeles writer and the onetime rebellious daughter of Reagan and his second wife, Nancy, said in a telephone interview that she never discussed same-sex marriage with the former president, who died in 2004 just as it was emerging as a political issue.

But Ms. Davis, now 60, offered several reasons her father, who would have been 102 this year, would have bucked his party on the issue: his distaste for government intrusion into private lives, his Hollywood acting career and close friendship with a lesbian couple who once cared for Ms. Davis and her younger brother Ron while their parents were on a Hawaiian vacation — and slept in the Reagans’ king-size bed.

“I grew up in this era where your parents’ friends were all called aunt and uncle,” Ms. Davis said. “And then I had an aunt and an aunt. We saw them on holidays and other times.” She added, “We never talked about it, but I just understood that they were a couple.”

Once when she and her father were watching a Rock Hudson movie, Ms. Davis said, she remarked that the actor “looked weird” kissing his female co-star. She said her father explained that Mr. Hudson “would rather be kissing a man,” and conveyed, without using the words homosexual or gay, the idea that “some men are born wanting to love another man.” Years later, in 1985, Mr. Hudson died of AIDS.

Skip

Mr. Reagan had a mixed record on gay rights. As president, he infuriated many gay people with his slow response to the AIDS epidemic, but as governor of California he joined a number of Democrats, including President Jimmy Carter, in opposing a ballot measure that would have barred gays and lesbians from working in public schools.

Ms. Davis said her father “did not believe that gayness was a choice,” although “as a straight man and an old-fashioned man, it’s not like he understood it.”

Ms. Davis’s comments are certain to inflame conservative admirers of her father. {Read More}

Via: Memeorandum